Protection / International protection
- Amnesty International 1
- Austria: Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) 1
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 1
- Finland: Supreme Administrative Court 1
- Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre 2
- Norwegian Refugee Council/Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (NRC/IDMC) 1
- Sweden: Swedish Migration Agency 1
- UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) 6
- United States Department of State 2
|
UNHCR Guidance Note on the International Protection Needs of People Fleeing Afghanistan
February 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country/Situation Specific Position Papers |
|
RÄTTSLIGT STÄLLNINGSTAGANDE: Prövningen av skyddsbehov och verkställighetshinder
för personer som är hemmahörande i Afghanistan
23 July 2021 | Publisher: Sweden: Swedish Migration Agency | Document type: Policy/Position Papers |
|
DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
On those grounds, the Court (Third Chamber) hereby rules: 1. Article 15(c) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as precluding the interpretation of national legislation according to which, where a civilian is not specifically targeted by reason of factors particular to his or her personal circumstances, a finding of serious and individual threat to that civilian’s life or person by reason of ‘indiscriminate violence in situations of … armed conflict’, within the meaning of that provision, is subject to the condition that the ratio between the number of casualties in the relevant area and the total number of individuals composing the population of that area reach a fixed threshold. 2. Article 15(c) of Directive 2011/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to determine whether there is a ‘serious and individual threat’, within the meaning of that provision, a comprehensive appraisal of all the circumstances of the individual case, in particular those which characterise the situation of the applicant’s country of origin, is required. 10 June 2021 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Generalized violence - International protection | Countries: Afghanistan - Germany |
|
The Researcher, October 2018
October 2018 | Publisher: Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre | Document type: Case Law Compilations/Analyses |
|
The Researcher, October 2018
October 2018 | Publisher: Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre | Document type: Case Law Compilations/Analyses |
|
Escaping war: where to next?
January 2018 | Publisher: Norwegian Refugee Council/Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (NRC/IDMC) | Document type: Thematic Reports |
|
Escaping war: where to next?
January 2018 | Publisher: Norwegian Refugee Council/Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (NRC/IDMC) | Document type: Thematic Reports |
|
Supreme Administrative Court Decision of 20 April 2016
20 April 2016 | Judicial Body: Finland: Supreme Administrative Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Burden-sharing and international co-operation - International protection - Non-refoulement - Regional instruments | Countries: Afghanistan - Finland - Hungary - Serbia |
|
2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - Afghanistan
8 April 2011 | Publisher: United States Department of State | Document type: Annual Reports |
|
Afghanistan Protection Cluster: Protection Overview (Southern Region 2010)
8 February 2011 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country Reports |
