Uganda: Government must safeguard freedom of expression after arrest and attack
| Publisher | Article 19 |
| Publication Date | 4 May 2017 |
| Cite as | Article 19, Uganda: Government must safeguard freedom of expression after arrest and attack, 4 May 2017, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/590b2a6b4.html [accessed 21 May 2023] |
| Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |
ARTICLE 19 is concerned by the recent abduction, torture, arrest, and prosecution of a journalist and academic exercising their right to freedom of expression.
On 7 April 2017 Dr Stella Nyazi, an academic, poet and social media user, was arrested and prosecuted under Sections 24 and 25 of the Computer Misuse Act 2011, allegedly for harassing and using indecent language against the president and the first family online.
Nyanzi has recently led a public campaign to collect and distribute sanitary pads to school girls, and alleged that the First Lady and Minister of Education, Janet Museveni, had failed to keep the promise to improve access to sanitary products over the last 31 years of National Resistance Movement (NRM) leadership.
A day later, Nation Television (NTV) Uganda journalist, Gertrude Uwitware, was abducted and tortured after publishing a blog post defending Nyanzi.
"The use of this law against the academic threatens to limit artistic freedom and public debate on an important issue like women and girls' reproductive health and access to education", said Henry Maina, Director of ARTICLE 19 Eastern Africa.
"The Ugandan government must respect the Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of expression under Article 29. The arrest and attack also show a failure to uphold promises made by the government to safeguard freedom of expression during the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process," said Maina.
The broadly phrased and vague Computer Misuse Act criminalises obscenity and indecency without defining these concepts. This is in contradiction to the Ugandan government's freedom of expression obligations, as obscenity is not a form of expression that may be restricted under international law. Any restrictions on freedom of expression for the protection of public morals must be based on a narrow understanding of what 'public morals' means.
Additionally, the law uses three terms, 'disturb the quiet', 'with no purpose of legitimate communication' and 'offensive communications', which are too broad and vague to satisfy the three-part test on what constitutes an acceptable limit on free expression under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Uganda is a signatory.
We urge the Ugandan Government to ensure that it fulfils its obligations to meet international freedom of expression standards, as well as to protect journalists from torture, attacks and intimidation and investigate the attack on Gertrude Uwitware, in line with its obligations under the UN Convention against Torture.
We also urge the amendment of Sections 24 and 25 of the Computer Misuse Act 2011 in order to bring it into line with international standards on the protection of free expression.
