Last Updated: Friday, 26 May 2023, 13:32 GMT

Brazil: Update to BRA33317.E of 6 December 1999 on state protection against drug gangs in Brazil, particularly in and around Rio de Janeiro (2000 to April 2003)

Publisher Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Author Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Canada
Publication Date 5 May 2003
Citation / Document Symbol BRA41404.FE
Reference 7
Cite as Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Brazil: Update to BRA33317.E of 6 December 1999 on state protection against drug gangs in Brazil, particularly in and around Rio de Janeiro (2000 to April 2003), 5 May 2003, BRA41404.FE, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3f7d4d622a.html [accessed 28 May 2023]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Several sources indicate that favelas (shantytowns) in Rio de Janeiro are controlled by drug gangs (Courrier international 7 Oct. 2002; Brazzil Oct. 2002; Knight Ridder 4 Feb. 2003; EFE News Service 9 Apr. 2000). According to the sources consulted, drug gangs provide entertainment, playgrounds, medicine and food to favela residents (Washington Post 8 July 2001; ibid. 19 Sept. 2002). Furthermore, another source indicated that these gangs offer [translation] "parallel security" to the residents: [translation] "armed to the teeth, they act like police and reduce petty crime" (Courrier international 7 Oct. 2002). This phenomenon, once unique to favelas, seems to be spreading to other middle-class neighbourhoods in the city (ibid.; New York Times 29 June 2002; Washington Post 15 Dec. 2002).

Drug gangs have become "a recognised socio-political force" at the favela level (Dowdney 2002, 38). They ensure that favela residents have access to certain services, while establishing rules and codes of behaviour that serve both their interests and those of the community (ibid., 39). Any breach of these rules carries punitive action (ibid.). The result is a system of "forced reciprocity" (ibid., 40).      

On the issue of state protection against drug gangs, André Fernandes, president of the residents' association of Morro Dona Marta in the southern district of Rio, said that [translation] "[f]avela residents equate the official police with cruelty and extortion. Favela residents do not support drug traffickers, but they do feel a little safer when they are around" (Courrier international 7 Oct. 2002). Carolina Berard, a Brazilian journalist, wrote that the people of Brazil, and more specifically the favela residents, felt a "lack of confidence" in the police force (Brazzil Oct. 2002).

Country Reports 2002 indicated that a number of families in the favelas (approximately 33 per week) were forced out of their homes during the year for refusing to cooperate with drug gangs (Country Reports 2002 31 Mar. 2003, Sec. 1.f.). The same source reported that Brazilian police failed to provide them with the protection they needed to remain in their homes (ibid.). In the same vein, Country Reports 2002 noted that police failed to protect a journalist who had received repeated death threats after her series of investigative reports on drug trafficking in favelas (ibid., Sec. 2.a.). The Chicago Tribune stated that "[d]rug traffickers have long turned slum neighborhoods in Rio into dangerous areas for police who enter them only in military-style operations. Gangs in those communities often outnumber and outgun the police" (12 Jan. 2003). Another source added that police raids on favelas are usually violent, that they often result in the death of innocent favela residents, and that police corruption is commonplace (Dowdney 2002, 7).

Brazilian authorities have repeatedly revamped security plans in an attempt to curb the increasing crime and violence in the country (EFE News Service 14 Mar. 2003), and put in place various anti-drug strategies during the 2000-2002 period, such as a new federal anti-drug law and a federal drug court (International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2002 1 Mar. 2003; International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2001 1 Mar. 2002; International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2000 2001). For more information on the revamped strategies, see the section on Brazil in the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2002 at the following Internet address: .

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

References

Brazzil [Los Angeles]. October 2002. Carolina Berard. "The War Within." [Accessed 30 Apr. 2003]

Chicago Tribune. 12 January 2003. "14 Die in Police Raid on Drug Traffickers." (NEXIS)

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2002. 31 March 2003. United States Department of State. Washington, D.C. [Accessed 29 Apr. 2003]

Courrier international [Paris]. 7 October 2002. Francison Alves Filho and Marcos Pernambuco. "La criminalité organisée." (NEXIS)

Dowdney, Luke. 2002. Child Combatants in Organised Armed Violence: A Study of Children and Adolescents Involved inTerritorial Drug Faction Disputes in Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: ISER/Viva Rio. [Accessed 1 May 2003]

EFE News Services. 14 March 2003. "Brazil-Crime: Brazilian Gov't Creates Plan to Fight Crime Wave." (NEXIS)

______. 9 April 2000. "Brazil-Drugs: Drug Trade Thrives in Rio de Janeiro." (NEXIS)

International Narcotics Control Stategy Report 2002. 1 March 2003. United States Department of State. Washington, D.C. [Accessed 29 Apr. 2003]

International Narcotics Control Stategy Report 2001. 1 March 2002. United States Department of State. Washington, D.C. [Accessed 29 Apr. 2003]

International Narcotics Control Stategy Report 2000. 2001. United States Department of State. Washington, D.C. [Accessed 29 Apr. 2003]

Knight Ridder. 4 February 2003. Kevin G. Hall. "To Improve Rio's Slums, New President Must Get Past Drug Gangs." [Accessed 30 Apr. 2003]

New York Times. 29 June 2002. Larry Rohter. "Drug Lords Become More Powerful in Brazil's 'Favelas'." [Accessed 30 Apr. 2003]

The Washington Post. 15 December 2002. Anthony Faiola. "Brazil's Gangs Invade Once-Sheltered Turf; Drug Wars Felt Even in Wealthy Areas." (NEXIS)

______. 19 September 2002. Anthony Faiola. "Brazil's Benevolent Drug Lords." [Accessed 30 Apr. 2003]

______. 8 July 2001. Anthony Faiola. "Cocaine a Consuming Problem in Brazil; Drug-Fueled Violence Turns Slums Into Urban Battlefields." (NEXIS)

Additional Sources Consulted

IRB Databases

Internet sites, including:

Amnesty International

Human Rights Watch

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

WNC

Search engine:

Google

Copyright notice: This document is published with the permission of the copyright holder and producer Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB). The original version of this document may be found on the offical website of the IRB at http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/. Documents earlier than 2003 may be found only on Refworld.

Search Refworld

Countries