Last Updated: Tuesday, 23 May 2023, 12:44 GMT

Adjudication of asylum claims (refugee status determination / asylum procedures) / Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims

Selected filters: India
Filter:
Showing 1-3 of 3 results
R.S. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Application for judicial review.

19 January 2011 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Grounds for persecution - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims | Countries: India - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Refugee Appeal No. 76432

2 December 2009 | Judicial Body: New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Grounds for persecution - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - Prosecution vs persecution | Countries: India - New Zealand

In the Petition of Sukhwat Singh Gill for Judicial Review of a decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to certify his claim as "clearly unfounded" in terms of section 94(2) of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002

18 May 2006 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Country of origin information (COI) - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - State protection - Well-founded fear of persecution | Countries: India - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search Refworld