Case Law

Case Law includes national and international jurisprudential decisions. Administrative bodies and tribunals are included.

Afghanistan 1
Algeria 2
Australia 3
Austria 1
Azerbaijan 1
Bangladesh 1
Belgium 1
Canada 33
China 10
Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1
Croatia 2
Cuba 1
Egypt 2
El Salvador 1
Eritrea 1
Ethiopia 1
France 5
Germany 3
Guyana 1
Hungary 2
Iraq 1
Jordan 2
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 1
Korea, Republic of 1
Lebanon 3
Netherlands 2
New Zealand 6
Nigeria 2
Pakistan 1
Romania 1
Russian Federation 2
Rwanda 1
Serbia 1
Sierra Leone 1
Somalia 1
South Africa 2
Sri Lanka 12
Sweden 1
Syrian Arab Republic 2
Tunisia 3
Türkiye 2
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 4
United States of America 4
Zimbabwe 1

1951 Refugee Convention 2

Selected filters: Serious non-political crime

Filter:

Showing 11-20 of 68 results

Applicants (two Lebanese nationals and their minor children) vs. Minister for Immigration, Integration and Asylum 27 September 2013 \| Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) \| Topic(s): Exclusion clauses - Serious non-political crime \| Countries: Lebanon - Netherlands
AH (Article 1F(b) – 'serious') Algeria v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department 5 August 2013 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Countries: Algeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Matter of E-A- Appeal dismissed on grounds that the applicant’s actions as a member of a group that burned passenger buses and cars, threw stones, and disrupted the economic activity of merchants in the market, while pretending to be from the opposition party in order to discredit such party, reached the level of serious criminal conduct which outweighed its political nature and therefore constituted a serious nonpolitical crime. 11 September 2012 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Countries: Côte d'Ivoire - United States of America
Profitt v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Application for review of decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board. Application granted on basis that the Board failed to provide adequate reasons regarding conclusion of exclusion under Article 1F(b) and to not follow the Jayasekara doctrine. 30 April 2012 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court \| Topic(s): Domestic violence - Exclusion clauses - Gender-based persecution - Serious non-political crime \| Countries: Canada - Guyana
Jawad v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 21 February 2012 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court \| Topic(s): Drug trafficking - Exclusion clauses - Serious non-political crime \| Countries: Canada - Lebanon
X et al. v. Canada 8 December 2011 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada \| Countries: Canada - Iran, Islamic Republic of
Meza Delgado v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 3 November 2011 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court \| Topic(s): Exclusion clauses - Serious non-political crime - Social group persecution \| Countries: Canada - El Salvador
Botezatu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 21 July 2011 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Exclusion clauses - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Serious non-political crime \| Countries: Canada - Romania
Private Proceeding X 23 June 2011 \| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court \| Countries: Canada - Mexico
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. B and D 9 November 2010 \| Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union \| Topic(s): Acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations - Armed groups / Militias / Paramilitary forces / Resistance movements - Exclusion clauses - Right to seek asylum - Serious non-political crime - Terrorism \| Countries: Germany - Türkiye

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips