Case Law

-

11 March 2005 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Topic(s): Visas | Countries: Australia - Fiji

This case affirms that leave may be granted to challenge a decision of the Immigration department should an applicant have ‘an arguable case’. It looks at judicial review which may have relevance and implications for refugee status determination and other migration purposes.

5 July 2004 | Judicial Body: Fiji: High Court | Topic(s): Immigration law | Countries: Fiji

25 MAY 2004 (CORRIGENDUM 21 JULY 2004)

25 May 2004 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Countries: Australia - Fiji

Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

10 May 2004 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Countries: Australia - Fiji

Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

2 February 2004 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Countries: Australia - Fiji

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued and Submitted December 9, 1999--San Francisco, California. Filed: July 3, 2001 Amended: October 22, 2001

22 October 2001 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Topic(s): Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Freedom of expression - Freedom of speech - Persecution based on political opinion | Countries: Fiji - United States of America

17 December 2000 | Judicial Body: New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Coup d'état - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Non-state agents of persecution - Racial / Ethnic persecution - State protection | Countries: Fiji - New Zealand