Last Updated: Friday, 19 May 2023, 07:24 GMT

Case Law

Case Law includes national and international jurisprudential decisions. Administrative bodies and tribunals are included.
Filter:
Showing 1-5 of 5 results
R (on the application of ) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Application for judicial review.

4 November 2010 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Effective protection - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - Non-state agents of persecution - Persecution based on political opinion - State protection | Countries: Pakistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

R (on the application of Sarwat) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Application for judicial review.

6 October 2009 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Ahmadis - Domestic violence - Effective protection - Fresh / New claim - Prosecution vs persecution - State protection - Women-at-risk | Countries: Pakistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

R (on the application of Umar) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Application for judicial review.

10 October 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Domestic violence - Effective protection - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - Non-state agents of persecution - State protection | Countries: Nigeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

R (on the application of Andreasen) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Application for judicial review of a decision of the Secretary of State to certify his asylum claim as clearly unfounded.

25 October 2007 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - Non-state agents of persecution - State protection | Countries: South Africa - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

R (on the Application of Obassi) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

The claimant applied for judicial review of the decision of the Secretary of State to certify his asylum and human rights claim as being clearly unfounded.

16 February 2007 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Christian - Country of origin information (COI) - Criminal justice - Deportation / Forcible return - Effective protection - Expedited procedures - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - State protection | Countries: Nigeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search Refworld