Intervention before the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in the case of R (on the application of A) v. London Borough of Croydon; R (on the application of M) v. London Borough of Lambeth
11 September 2008 | Publisher: Liberty | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
AA (Afghanistan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
On appeal from the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (HX/58241/2003). 29 January 2007 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Credibility assessment - Involuntary repatriation - Persecution based on political opinion - Reception - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: Afghanistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Evangelisches Hilfswerk v. Republic of Austria
This is an unofficial translation made by BO Vienna. The Austrian Supreme Court ("Oberster Gerichtshof"; the last instance in civil law) in a decision of 24 February 2003 (No 1 Ob 272/02k; published only on 22 April 2003) ruled that the Austrian State is obliged to accommodate and support all needy asylum seekers in Austria who co-operate in the determination of their identity. Consequently, the view of the Austrian State, according to which the authorities have discretionary power in deciding whom to accommodate and support, was rejected. Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled that NGOs who accommodated asylum seekers, who were denied State assistance, may claim reimbursement by the State for the costs related to accommodation and support of asylum seekers during the last 30(!) years. 24 February 2003 | Judicial Body: Austria: Supreme Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Reception | Countries: Afghanistan - Austria |