Last Updated: Wednesday, 17 May 2023, 15:20 GMT

Adjudication of asylum claims (refugee status determination / asylum procedures) / Agents of persecution

Filter:
Showing 1-10 of 37 results
GRACE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendants-Appellants

For UNHCR’s intervention at the district court level, see the Brief of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees as Amicus Curaie in Support of Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in case Grace, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, et. al., Defendants. For UNHCR’s intervention in this case, see Brief of Amicus Curiae United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees in case Grace, et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et. al., Defendants-Appellants. From the Court: "Twelve asylum seekers challenge a host of executive-branch policies adopted to implement the expedited-removal provisions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), [...]. Broadly speaking, the challenged policies concern how asylum officers determine whether an alien has demonstrated a “credible fear” of persecution, a threshold showing that permits an alien who would otherwise be immediately deported to seek asylum in the United States. The asylum seekers principally argue that the policies raise the bar for demonstrating a credible fear of persecution far above what Congress intended and that the Attorney General and various agencies violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), [...] by failing to adequately address important factors bearing on the policies’ adoption. Largely on these grounds, the district court found the policies inconsistent with IIRIRA, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), [...] seq., and the APA, and enjoined their enforcement. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm in part and reverse in part."

20 May 2021 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Burden of proof - State protection | Countries: United States of America

Urteil vom 30. Januar 2018

https://www.bvger.ch/bvger/de/home/rechtsprechung/entscheiddatenbank-bvger.html

30 January 2018 | Judicial Body: Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Security situation | Countries: Afghanistan - Switzerland

Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, Attorney General

18 January 2017 | Publisher: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Document type: Annual Reports

Qualification for International Protection (Directive 2011/95/EU): A Judicial Analysis

December 2016 | Publisher: European Union: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) | Document type: Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries

AATA Case No. 1609717

6 September 2016 | Judicial Body: Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Persecution based on political opinion - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Australia - Viet Nam

Lkhagvasuren v. Lynch, Attorney General

13 July 2016 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Corruption - Persecution based on political opinion | Countries: Mongolia - United States of America

Matter of A-R-C-G- et al.

26 August 2014 | Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Domestic violence - Gender-based persecution - Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) - Social group persecution | Countries: El Salvador - Guatemala - United States of America

"No One's Left" - Summary Executions by Syrian Forces in al-Bayda & Baniyas

13 September 2013 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country Reports

Matters of C.P.-G., C.-G., V.-C., C.-G., and A.-C., Amicus Curiae Brief, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees In Support of Respondents

21 November 2012 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae

Considering Asylum Claims and Assessing Credibility

2012 | Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office | Document type: Thematic Guidelines

Search Refworld