Decision 202101105/1/V1
3 January 2022 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Article 1D - Palestinian - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Statelessness - UNRWA | Countries: Iraq - Netherlands |
XY v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl Case C-18/20
preliminary ruling on interpretation of article 40 Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection 9 September 2021 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Austria - Iraq |
Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe in Case C‑18/20
(1) The concept of ‘new elements or findings [that] have arisen or have been presented by the applicant’, as used in Article 40(2) and (3) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, must be interpreted as meaning that it also covers elements or findings which already existed before the procedure relating to a previous application for international protection was definitively concluded, but which were not relied on by the applicant in the context of that procedure. (2) Article 40(3) of Directive 2013/32 must be interpreted as meaning that the substantive examination of a subsequent application does not require a specific procedure, provided that the national procedure fulfils the requirements laid down in Chapter II of that directive. Article 42(2) of that directive, read in conjunction with Article 40(2) to (4) and Article 33(2)(d) thereof, must be interpreted as prohibiting the setting of time limits per se. (3) Article 40(4) of Directive 2013/32 must be interpreted as meaning that the condition relating to the absence of fault laid down therein cannot be applied in the context of an administrative procedure unless that condition is expressly laid down in national law in a manner that satisfies the requirements of legal certainty. It is for the referring court to verify whether this is the case here. 15 April 2021 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Austria - Iraq |
Adil Hassan v Préfet du Pas-de-Calais (Case C‑647/16) Reference for a preliminary ruling
Article 26(1) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person must be interpreted as precluding a Member State that has submitted, to another Member State which it considers to be responsible for the examination of an application for international protection pursuant to the criteria laid down by that regulation, a request to take charge of or take back a person referred to in Article 18(1) of that regulation from adopting a transfer decision and notifying it to that person before the requested Member State has given its explicit or implicit agreement to that request. 31 May 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: France - Germany - Iraq |
Views adopted by the Committee under the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2601/2015
4 September 2017 | Publisher: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Document type: Country/Situation Specific Position Papers |
R. (on the application of Al-Anizy) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
25 April 2017 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Family reunification - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to family life - Visas | Countries: Iraq - Kuwait - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Arrêt n° 144 188
27 April 2015 | Judicial Body: Belgium: Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Regional instruments | Countries: Belgium - Iraq - Italy |
The Researcher, October 2014
October 2014 | Publisher: Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre | Document type: Country Reports |
Forced Migration Review No. 44 - Detention,
alternatives to detention, and deportation
September 2013 | Publisher: Refugee Studies Centre | Document type: Thematic Reports |
NM (documented/undocumented Bidoon: risk) Kuwait CG v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department
22 July 2013 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Citizenship / Nationality law - Denial of nationality - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Persecution of family members - Racial / Ethnic persecution - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to a nationality - Statelessness - Statelessness | Countries: Iraq - Kuwait - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |