Last Updated: Thursday, 25 May 2023, 07:30 GMT

Human rights / Arbitrary arrest and detention

Selected filters: Afghanistan
Filter:
Showing 31-40 of 183 results
The situation of human rights in Afghanistan and technical assistance achievements in the field of human rights

11 January 2017 | Publisher: UN Human Rights Council | Document type: Country Reports

Information Centre Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes (14 November 2016)

14 November 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News

Informationszentrum Asyl und Migration Briefing Notes (14 November 2016)

14 November 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News

Pakistan: Coerced Refugee Return Endangers Thousands

14 September 2016 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

Afghanistan: Security Forces Assault Reporters

1 September 2016 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

Informationszentrum Asyl und Migration Briefing Notes (27 Juni 2016)

27 June 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News

Information Centre Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes (27 June 2016)

27 June 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News

Afghanistan: End 'Moral Crimes' Charges, 'Virginity' Tests

25 May 2016 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

A. gegen Staatssekretariat für Migration

2 May 2016 | Judicial Body: Switzerland: Federal Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Burden-sharing and international co-operation - Immigration Detention - Regional instruments | Countries: Afghanistan - Bulgaria - Switzerland

F.J. et al. v. Australia

asylum seekers’ detention is arbitrary and contrary to their right to liberty if the State fails to demonstrate on an individual basis that their continuous indefinite detention is justified, and that other, less intrusive, measures could not achieve the same end of compliance with the State’s need to respond to security concerns. In addition, the HRC considers that the combination of the arbitrary character and indefinite nature of the authors’ protracted detention, the absence of procedural guarantees to challenge the detention and the difficult conditions of detention, cumulatively inflict serious psychological harm that amount to “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” under the ICCPR.

2 May 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention | Countries: Afghanistan - Australia - Iran, Islamic Republic of - Sri Lanka

Search Refworld