X v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid Case C‑69/21
The Court adopted the view that a return decision or removal order does not infringe the right to respect for the private life of a third-country national concerned on the sole ground that, if he or she were returned to the receiving country, that national would be exposed to the risk that his or her state of health deteriorates, where such a risk does not reach the severity threshold required under Article 4 of the Charter. Nonetheless, the Court ruled that the national's state of health and the care received must be considered by the competent national authority, along with other relevant factors (such as social ties, dependency, and health fragility), when determining whether the national's right to respect for private life precludes removal. 22 November 2022 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2008 Returns Directive (EU) | Topic(s): Border controls - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Non-refoulement - Right to health | Countries: Netherlands - Russian Federation |
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston: T. v Land Baden-Württemberg
11 September 2014 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): National security / Public order - Non-refoulement - Refoulement - Regional instruments - Residence permits / Residency | Countries: Germany - Türkiye |
Conclusions de l'Avocat Général M. Melchior Wathelet: Khaled Boudjlida contre Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques
25 June 2014 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Non-refoulement - Regional instruments - Right to family life - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Algeria - France |