Title | AI and Others v Director of Asylum Seeker Management: Department of Home Affairs and Others (22059/18) [2019] ZAWCHC 114 |
Publisher | South Africa: High Court |
Publication Date | 2 September 2019 |
Country | Burundi | South Africa |
Topics | Refugees sur place | Rejected asylum-seekers |
Cite as | AI and Others v Director of Asylum Seeker Management: Department of Home Affairs and Others (22059/18) [2019] ZAWCHC 114 , South Africa: High Court, 2 September 2019, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ZAF_HC,5d7a1f604.html [accessed 17 May 2023] |
Comments | The applicants have shown that they have a clear right to the relief they ultimately seek in the main application, a well-grounded apprehension of harm and no other satisfactory remedy. The respondents seek to have the Immigration Act trump the Refugees Act. This is contrary to the injunction in the Ruta case that the two statutes can and should be read in harmony. The applicants are thus entitled to the interim relief they seek, i.e. that they be issued with section 22 permits. |
Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |