Title	E 4682/2019-10
Publisher	Austria: Constitutional Court of Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
Publication Date	20 February 2020
Country	Afghanistan | Austria
Topics	Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) | Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription | Non-state agents of persecution
Cite as	E 4682/2019-10 , Austria: Constitutional Court of Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof), 20 February 2020, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,AUT_FCCA,5ede0e5f4.html [accessed 18 May 2023]
Comments	The contested finding therefore lacks a conclusive reason why there is no persecution relevant to asylum, in the absence of a discussion of the dangers that threaten the complainant due to the attempted forced recruitment, which has been found to be credible. Likewise, in connection with the examination of the requirements for the granting of the status of subsidiary protection, there is no comprehensible reason for the statement that the complainant is not at risk from the Taliban in Mazar-e Sharif and that a return there is safe and reasonable while the UNHCR guidelines basically assume that there is no internal flight alternative in Afghanistan for people who are persecuted by the Taliban
Disclaimer	This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.