Title | LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid |
Publisher | European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union |
Publication Date | 10 June 2021 |
Country | Afghanistan | Netherlands |
Topics | Credibility assessment | Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures |
Citation / Document Symbol | ECLI:EU:C:2021:478 |
Cite as | LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, ECLI:EU:C:2021:478, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 10 June 2021, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECJ,60db07ee4.html [accessed 19 May 2023] |
Comments | On those grounds, the Court (Third Chamber) hereby rules: 1. Article 40(2) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in conjunction with Article 4(2) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which any document submitted by an applicant for international protection in support of a subsequent application is automatically considered not to constitute a ‘new element or finding’, within the meaning of that provision, when the authenticity of that document cannot be established or its source objectively verified. 2. Article 40 of Directive 2013/32, read in conjunction with Article 4(1) and (2) of Directive 2011/95, must be interpreted as meaning, first, that the assessment of the evidence submitted in support of an application for international protection cannot vary according to whether the application is a first application or a subsequent application and, second, that a Member State is required to cooperate with an applicant for the purpose of assessing the relevant elements of his or her subsequent application, when that applicant submits, in support of that application, documents the authenticity of which cannot be established. |
Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |