Last Updated: Tuesday, 23 May 2023, 12:44 GMT

Colombia: The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, FARC), including demobilization of former combatants; information on dissident groups, including number of combatants, areas of operation, activities and state response (2016-April 2018)

Publisher Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Publication Date 18 April 2018
Citation / Document Symbol COL106084.E
Related Document(s) Colombie : information sur les Forces armées révolutionnaires de Colombie (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia - FARC), y compris la démobilisation d'anciens combattants; les groupes dissidents, y compris le nombre de combattants, les zones d'opération, les activités et l'intervention de l'État (2016-avril 2018)
Cite as Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Colombia: The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, FARC), including demobilization of former combatants; information on dissident groups, including number of combatants, areas of operation, activities and state response (2016-April 2018), 18 April 2018, COL106084.E, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5afad95e4.html [accessed 25 May 2023]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.
18 April 2018
COL106084.E
Colombia: The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, FARC), including demobilization of former combatants; information on dissident groups, including number of combatants, areas of operation, activities and state response (2016-April 2018)

Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa

1. Overview

A peace agreement with the FARC was signed on 24 November 2016 (Amnesty International 22 Nov. 2017; BBC 19 Feb. 2017). Sources report that the FARC has disbanded since the signing of the peace agreement and that it has become a political party (AFP 20 Feb. 2018; Al Jazeera 14 Mar. 2018). Sources indicate that the political party's name is Revolutionary Alternative Common Force [Fuerza Alternativa Revolucionaria del Común, FARC party] (The Guardian 1 Nov. 2017; Al Jazeera 14 Mar. 2018; El País 1 Sept. 2017). According to sources, the political party secured 0.22 percent of votes in the lower House of Representatives (Cámara de Representantes) and 0.34 percent of votes in the Senate (Senado de la República) in Colombia's congressional elections of March 2018 (RCN 11 Mar. 2018; Infobae 12 Mar. 2018). Sources report that despite the results of the elections, the FARC party is guaranteed to have five seats in both the lower House of Representatives and the Senate as part of the peace agreement (BBC 12 Mar. 2018; The Irish Times 12 Mar. 2018).

The Guardian cites the director of the Fundación Paz y Reconciliación [1] as stating that "'just one year after the [peace agreement] was signed[,] we are seeing fewer kidnappings, fewer landmine victims, fewer murders'" (The Guardian 5 Dec. 2017). Nonetheless, according to Amnesty International, the peace agreement with the FARC "is having a very limited impact on the lives of scores of Indigenous and afro-descendent communities in the department of Chocó" (Amnesty International 22 Nov. 2017).

2. Demobilization of FARC Combatants

According to media sources, there are 26 transition zones [also referred to as cantonments, demobilization zones or demobilization camps] for former FARC combatants (The Guardian 27 June 2017; BBC 19 Feb. 2017). Media sources indicate that approximately 7,000 FARC combatants have demobilized (The Guardian 27 June 2017; Al Jazeera 14 Mar. 2018; Reuters 15 Aug. 2017). Reuters reports that in 2017, "[m]ore than 11,000 fighters and collaborators from the [FARC] handed over their weapons" (Reuters 23 Nov. 2017).

Sources indicate that after demobilizing, former combatants go through a reintegration process that is headed by the Reincorporation and Normalization Agency [Agencia para la Reincorporación y la Normalización, ARN] [2] (Flisi 13 Feb. 2017; Kaplan and Nussio 3 Aug. 2017). According to the ARN, the reintegration process targets ''demobilized people of illegal armed groups who are willing to reintegrate into the social and economic life" (Colombia n.d.a). According to the same source, the "Reintegration Route lasts 6 years and a half [o]n average" (Colombia n.d.c). The ARN further indicates that

[w]hen a person joins the Reintegration Process, he/she receives economic support for his/her reintegration if he/she attends at least 90 per cent of the activities scheduled by [ARN].

Each person undergoing a Reintegration Process commits to develop at least 80 hours of Social Service actions that are fundamental to generate spaces for reconciliation. (Colombia n.d.a)

The same source adds that the process can be accessed by persons accredited as demobilized by the Operational Committee for the Abandonment of Weapons (Comité Operativo para la Dejación de las Armas, CODA) or the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace (Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz, OACP), who demobilized after 24 January 2003, including people who were part of the FARC, the National Liberation Army (Ejército de Liberación Nacional, ELN), the People's Liberation Army (Ejército Popular de Liberación, EPL) and the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Unidas de Columbia - AUC) groups (Colombia n.d.a).

Sources indicate that the demobilization of FARC members has left a void in Colombia's countryside (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017; International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 2) and that "rival armed actors have taken their place, waging a battle for spoils: control of isolated communities and territories, many rich in illicit business" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 2). According to the Secretary General of Amnesty International, "armed conflict is still very much the reality for millions across" Colombia (Amnesty International 22 Nov. 2017). Al Jazeera reports that, according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) [3], "[f]ighting between the groups looking to take over FARC territory has resulted in more than 56,000 displacements in the first half of 2017" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). According to Amnesty International, in the department of Chocó,

[t]housands have been forced to flee their homes out of fear of the various armed groups operating in the area. Internally displaced Indigenous and afro-descendant communities are particularly vulnerable as they have had to leave their livelihoods behind with no state protection and support. (Amnesty International 22 Nov. 2017)

Andrew Anderson, the Executive Director of Front Line Defenders [4], cites Colombia's Ombudsperson as stating that social leaders and human rights defenders have been killed as a result of "'the attempt by illegal armed groups to occupy the territory from which the Farc have withdrawn'" (Anderson 23 Aug. 2017). According to Al Jazeera, 117 social leaders and human rights defenders were killed in 2016 (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). Al Jazeera reports that according to the INDEPAZ NGO [5], 106 social leaders and human rights defenders were killed between 1 January and 28 September 2017 (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). According to Andrew Anderson,

[a] number of factors have led to the rise in activist killings since the signing of the [peace] deal. After half a century of conflict, the country's justice institutions are overloaded, and impunity is rampant. There is rarely a consequence for killing a human rights defender. Additionally, the persistence of paramilitary structures means land rights activists and those working on peace education are still facing armed resistance to their work. And while authorities are beginning to recognize the critical role human rights defenders play in building a stable Colombia, smear campaigns from public authorities still jeopardize activists' reputations within their communities, which in turn erodes networks of local protection. (Anderson 23 Aug. 2017)

3. Dissident Groups

According to Agence France-Presse (AFP), "the government estimates that around 1,100 FARC members rejected the [peace agreement] and formed a breakaway group, supported by drug trafficking and illegal mining" (AFP 20 Feb. 2018). Other sources put the number of FARC members who did not demobilize at approximately 1,000 to 1,500, which accounts for around 15 percent of former FARC combatants (InSight Crime 17 Oct. 2017), at around 1,000 (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 2), or at approximately 800, or between 700 and 1,000, according to different estimates (Reuters 23 Nov. 2017).

Sources indicate that former FARC members are continuing to engage in drug trafficking (InSight Crime 17 Oct. 2017; Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). According to Al Jazeera, "[s]ecurity forces have … identified criminal networks led by FARC dissidents that are controlling drug trafficking corridors in the regions of Meta and Narino, as well as cocaine processing sites in Antioquia" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017).

According to the same source, "[m]any of the FARC dissidents have joined the ELN, EPL, small criminal gangs and larger organised crime groups" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). According to International Crisis Group, there are "[a]t least nine FARC dissident groups [that] continue to carry out violent attacks, refusing to assemble in the 26 cantonments and hand over their weapons" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 3). El Colombiano, a Medellín-based newspaper, states that according to Directive 37 of 2017 (Directiva 37 de 2017) of the Ministry of Defence (Ministerio de Defensa), the government classifies FARC dissident groups as Residual Organized Armed Groups (Grupos Armados Organizados Residuales, GAO Residual) (El Colombiano 15 Jan. 2018). Radio Cadena Nacional (RCN), a Colombian radio network, cites the Minister of Defence as stating that FARC dissidents are located in five regions that follow traditional narcotrafficking corridors and are remote areas where there is no government presence (RCN 9 Aug. 2017). AFP mentions "[d]issident FARC fighters patrol[ling] the jungle along the Inirida River in Colombia's Guaviare region" (AFP 20 Feb. 2018). According to International Crisis Group, the FARC dissident groups

operate across the country, principally in the departments of Nariño, Cauca, Caquetá, Guaviare, Vaupés, Guainía and Meta. While differing considerably in size, origin and military muscle, they share four traits: they represent only a sub-set of their original FARC units (to date no complete front has left the FARC); they all are involved in illegal economic activities; they seek to consolidate territorial control; and they operate in areas where they were active during the armed conflict, often expanding outward. (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 3)

According to International Crisis Group, "many dissident groups are more abusive than their FARC predecessors as they compete among themselves, sometimes brutalising local communities to maintain control" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 5). Al Jazeera cites the Education Secretary for the Municipality of Toribio as stating that "'[f]ormer FARC guerillas … know how to recruit vulnerable people and are employing more extreme tactics because they need these groups to grow quickly'" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). According to Al Jazeera, "[t]he recruitment of minors by dissident-led groups has … been seen outside Cauca with reports of young people b[e]ing targeted in the regions of Meta, Guaviare and Caqueta" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017). Al Jazeera cites the Education Secretary for the Municipality of Toribio as stating that "young people are especially vulnerable to recruitment in rural regions like Toribio" (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017).

Sources report of incidents where police officers were killed by alleged FARC dissidents (Al Jazeera 24 Oct. 2017; AFP 20 Feb. 2018).

According to International Crisis Group, "[t]he FARC [party] leadership has tried to maintain some contact with dissidents to convince them to return to the peace process" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 6). Reuters reports that "FARC [party] leaders have renounced the dissidents and emphasized that the group will move forward as a peaceful political party" (Reuters 23 Nov. 2017).

3.1 First Front (Frente Primero)

According to InSight Crime, First Front (Frente Primero) [also known as GAO Residual Oriental, Armando Ríos, Armando Ríos Front or the Armando Rios First Front] is "the main organization within an alliance of FARC dissidents" and it is the "most important of the criminal groups comprised of ex-members" of the FARC (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). El Colombiano cites Colombian police authorities as stating that First Front is the [translation] "largest of the dissident groups," with approximately 110 members (El Colombiano 10 Apr. 2017). Other sources report that First Front has 200 members (Reuters 6 July 2016), or approximately 400 members (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018; Noticias RCN 7 July 2016). According to El Colombiano, the First Front leader is Néstor Gregorio Vera Fernández, alias "Iván Mordisco" (El Colombiano 10 Apr. 2017). InSight Crime indicates that First Front has a "horizontal leadership structure" and is led by "ex-FARC commanders" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). The same source states that First Front leaders include Néstor Gregorio Fernández, alias "Iván Mordisco"; Miguel Botache Santillana, alias "Gentil Duarte"; Géner García Molina, alias "John 40"; Luis Alfonso Lizcano Gualdron, alias "Euclides Mora"; and Miguel Díaz Sanmarín, alias "Julian Chollo" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018).

According to InSight Crime, First Front is "highly mobile" and "its main operational base is in the village of Barranquilita in Miraflores" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). Sources indicate that First Front has a presence in Guaviare (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 4; Noticias RCN 7 July 2016; El Colombiano 10 Apr. 2017), with its greatest force present between the municipalities of Calamar and Miraflores (El Colombiano 10 Apr. 2017). According to International Crisis Group, "First Front has expanded from its traditional strongholds in Guaviare toward the regional capital, San José del Guaviare, into south-east Meta and parts of Vichada and Caquetá" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 4). According to InSight Crime, First Front's

princip[al] areas of influence are in Guaviare, Vaupés, Meta and Guainía. In Guaviare, the group has a presence in the municipalities of Calamar, Miraflores and El Retorno. In Vapués, it is concentrated in Cararurú and the municipalities that border Brazil, Pocoa and Taraira. In Meta, dissidents reportedly have a presence in Macarena, Vistahermosa, Uribe and Puerto Rico, while in Guainía dissidents are concentrated in Mapiripana, Morichan Nuevo and Pana Pana on the border with Brazil. (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018)

According to InSight Crime, the most common criminal activities of First Front have included "harassing and attacking security forces with explosives, engaging in forced recruitment, and extorting and threatening the civilian population" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). According to sources, First Front is involved in the drug trade (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018; Reuters 6 July 2016; El Colombiano 10 Apr. 2017).

According to InSight Crime, "other dissident fronts with which [the First Front] is allied are the 7th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 27th, 40th, 42nd, 43rd and 44th Fronts" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). According to International Crisis Group, "[i]n Guaviare and Meta, First and Seventh Front dissidents attack soldiers and police to protect the coca trade, actions that locals regard as protection for their livelihood from what they consider an insensitive state" (International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 4). According to InSight Crime, "[i]n Guaviare, [First Front] has established an alliance with the Urabeños" (InSight Crime 14 Mar. 2018). For further information on the Urabeños, see Response to Information Request COL105773.E of April 2017 and COL106086.E of April 2018.

International Crisis Group provides a table listing "confirmed and alleged FARC dissident groups," their leaders, areas of operation and estimated size, as of October 2017:

Confirmed and Alleged FARC Dissident Groups
Confirmed Dissident Faction FARC Units Involved in Faction Leader Area of Operation Estimated Size
First Front 1, 16 and Acacio Medina Ivan Mordisco Guaviare, Vaupes, Guianía, Vichada and southeast Meta and Caquetá 300-400
Seventh Front 7, 14 and 62 Gentil Duarte Southern Meta, Caquetá, northwest Guaviare 70-100
40th Front 40 Calarcá Western Meta 40-60
GUP Daniel Aldana Mobile Colum David Nariño 250-350
Ejército Patria Libre 6 Previously Simón el negro, killed in June 2017 Northern Cauca N/A
Jacobo Arenas Mobile Column Jacobo Arenas Mobile Column Pija Northern Cauca 80-100
29th Front 29 Previously Vaca, killed by own troops in August Nariño N/A
Ché Guevara Front ELN and 29 N/A Nariño N/A
Guacho's Group Daniel Aldana Mobile Column Guacho Tumaco N/A
Previously Confirmed, Now Unclear Front Leader Area of Operation Estimated Size
32nd Front 32 Caballo Putumayo N/A
Miller Perdomo Mobile Column MPMC N/A Northern Cauca N/A
17th Front 17 Benjamín Huila 10
Teófilo Forero Mobile Column TFMC N/A Northern Caquéta N/A
Reported but Never Confirmed Front Leader Area of Operation Estimated Size
57th Front 57 N/A Northern Choco N/A
21st Front 21 N/A Tolima N/A
48th Front 48 N/A Southern Putumayo N/A
3rd Front 3 N/A Northern Cauca N/A

(International Crisis Group 19 Oct. 2017, 37).

According to Vanguardia Liberal, a Bucaramanga newspaper, 57th Front is present in Urabá region of Antioquia and Chocó, 16th Front is present in Vichada and Guainía, 7th Front is present in Meta bordering Cundinamarca and 44th Front is present in Meta bordering Guaviare (Vanguardia Liberal 23 Sept. 2016). According to InSight Crime, "300 dissidents who formerly belonged to the FARC's 38th and 42nd Fronts" are present in the southwestern department of Putumayo (InSight Crime 17 Oct. 2017). According to the same source, there are 400 dissidents "operating in the municipality of Tumaco" and "at least 400 FARC dissidents in the Miraflores municipality" (InSight Crime 17 Oct. 2017). A map created by InSight Crime providing the locations of "Dissident Elements and Desertions from FARC Fronts" is attached to this Response.

4. State Response

Information on state response was scarce among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate within the time constraints of this Response.

El Colombiano reports that, according to Directive 37 of 2017 by the Ministry of Defence, tracking down FARC dissident groups is a "priority" (El Colombiano 15 Jan. 2018). According to the same source, among the dissident groups, the key objective of authorities are:

  • GAO Residual Oriental under the command of Miguel Santillana Botache ("Gentil Duarte"), Gener García Molina ("John 40") and Néstor Vera Fernández ("Iván Mordisco"), active in Caquetá, Guaviare, Vaupés, Guainía and Vichada;
  • GAO Residual Occidental and GAO Residual Sur, active in Nariño and the border between Cauca and Caquetá, headed by Wálter Arizala Bernaza ("Guacho") and Jairo Ortiz Calderón ("Jairo 1") (El Colombiano 15 Jan. 2018).

Reuters reports that, according to the Ministry of Defence, an executive order of October 2017 "allows troops to conduct bomb attacks against FARC dissidents and crime gangs from airplanes and helicopters, and shields the military from criminal prosecution …. [R]aids can only be carried out if civilians are not close by" (Reuters 31 Oct. 2017). Further and corroborating information could not be found among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate within the time constraints of this Response.

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim for refugee protection. Please find below the list of sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

Notes

[1] Fundación Paz y Reconciliación is a non-for-profit NGO dedicated to the study and analysis of the armed conflict, criminality, governance and human rights in Colombia (Fundación Paz y Reconciliación n.d.).

[2] The ARN [formerly the Colombian Agency for Reintegration (ACR) (Colombia n.d.d)] is "ascribed to the Presidency of the Republic of Colombia, in charge of coordinating, advising and executing - in partnership with other public and private entities - the Reintegration Route of demobilized people of organized illegal armed groups. In addition, the ARN designs, implements and assesses the State policy addressed to social and economic Reintegration of people or illegal armed groups who voluntarily demobilize in an individual or collective manner. The ACR works in coordination with the Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Interior and Justice and the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace" (Colombia n.d.b).

[3] IDMC is "the leading source of information and analysis on internal displacement" and is part of the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), an independent NGO (IDMC n.d.).

[4] Front Line Defenders is a NGO that "protects people who work, non-violently, for any or all of the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (Anderson 23 Aug. 2017). It "maintains its headquarters in Dublin, an EU Office in Brussels, and regionally-based field staff in the Americas, Asia, Africa and the Middle East" (Front Line Defenders n.d.).

[5] INDEPAZ is an NGO that undertakes research on the themes of development and peace (INDEPAZ n.d.).

References

Agence France-Presse (AFP). 20 February 2018. "Colombian Police Die in Clash with 'FARC Dissidents'." [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]

Al Jazeera. 14 March 2018. Luke Taylor. "Colombia: Why Did the FARC 'Fail' Its First Electoral Test?" [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Al Jazeera. 24 October 2017. Wil Crisp. "The New Struggle for Colombia's Countryside After FARC." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Amnesty International. 22 November 2017. "Colombia: Government Fails to Keep Civilians Safe as New Threats Go Unchallenged." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Anderson, Andrew. 23 August 2017. "Colombian Peace Doomed if Human Rights Defenders Not Protected." The Irish Times. [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 12 March 2018. "Colombia Election: Farc Fails to Win Support in First National Vote." [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018]

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 19 February 2017. "Colombia's Farc Rebels Complete Move to Demobilisation Zones." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Colombia. N.d.a. Agencia para la Reintegración y la Normalización (ARN). "What Is Reintegration?" [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018]

Colombia. N.d.b. Agencia para la Reintegración y la Normalización (ARN). "Reincorporation and Normalization Agency (ARN).'' [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018]

Colombia. N.d.c. Agencia para la Reintegración y la Normalización (ARN). "Frequently Asked Questions." [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018]

Colombia. N.d.d. Agencia para la Reintegración y la Normalización (ARN). "Historical Overview." [Accessed 13 Apr. 2018]

El Colombiano. 15 January 2018. Nelson Ricardo Matta Colorado. "El desafío que traen las bandas para 2018." [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]

El Colombiano. 10 April 2017. Ricardo Monsalve Gaviria. "¿Qué se sabe de la disidencia del frente primero de las Farc?" [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

El País. 1 September 2017. Francesco Manetto. "Fuerza Alternativa Revolucionaria del Común, nuevo nombre de las FARC." [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

Flisi, Isabella. 13 February 2017. "The Reintegration of Former Combatants in Colombia." Sustainable Security Programme Blog, Oxford Research Group. [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018]

Front Line Defenders. N.d. "Who We Are." [Accessed 13 Apr. 2018]

Fundación Paz y Reconciliación. N.d. "¿Quiénes somos?" [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

The Guardian. 5 December 2017. Joe Parkin Daniels. "'There's Nothing for Us': Farc Rebels Search for Purpose a Year After Historic Deal." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

The Guardian. 1 November 2017. Joe Parkin Daniels. "Colombia's Former Farc Rebel Chief 'Timochenko' to Run for President." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

The Guardian. 27 June 2017. Sibylla Brodzinsky. "'Welcome to Peace': Colombia's Farc Rebels Seal Historic Disarmament." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Infobae. 12 March 2018. "Las FARC no llegaron al 0,5% de los votos en las legislativas de Colombia." [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

InSight Crime. 14 March 2018. "1st Front Dissidence." [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]

InSight Crime. 17 October 2017. Angelika Albaladejo. "Is Colombia Underestimating the Scale of FARC Dissidence?" [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]

Instituto de Estudios para el Desarrollo y la Paz (INDEPAZ). N.d. "¿Quiénes somos?" [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). N.d. "About IDMC." [Accessed 12 Apr. 2018]

International Crisis Group. 19 October 2017. Colombia's Armed Groups Battle for the Spoils of Peace. Latin America Report No. 63. [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

The Irish Times. 12 March 2018. Tom Hennigan. "Colombia's Farc Fails to Win Single Seat in Congressional Elections." [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018]

Kaplan, Oliver and Enzo Nussio. 3 August 2017. "How to Keep the FARC Guerillas out of the Fight." The New York Times. [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018]

Noticias RCN. 7 July 2016. "Así opera el Frente Primero de las Farc, que no reconoce los acuerdos de paz." [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

Radio Cadena Nacional (RCN). 11 March 2018. "Partido Farc no alcanza umbral en el Congreso." [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

Radio Cadena Nacional (RCN). 9 August 2017. "Entre 5 y 7% de combatientes de las Farc pasaron a disidencias: MinDefensa." [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018]

Reuters. 23 November 2017. "FARC Dissidents Face Full Force of Colombia Military: President." [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]

Reuters. 31 October 2017. "Colombia Authorizes Air Raids Against Dissident FARC, Crime Gangs." [Accessed 16 Apr. 2018]

Reuters. 15 August 2017. "Colombia's FARC Rebels Turned in More than 8,000 Weapons: U.N." [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018]

Reuters. 6 July 2016. "Colombian Rebel Unit Says It Will Not Disarm Under Peace Deal." [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018]

Vanguardia Liberal. 23 September 2016. "Una disidencia del Frente Primero de las Farc dijo 'no'." [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018]

Additional Sources Consulted

Oral sources: Amnesty International; Centro de Recursos para el Análisis de Conflicto; Coordinación Colombia Europa Estados Unidos; Human Rights Watch; International Crisis Group; Fundación Paz y Reconciliación; INDEPAZ; InSight Crime; Latin America Working Group; Washington Office on Latin America.

Internet sites, including: Agencia EFE; Centro de Recursos de Análisis de Conflictos; Colombia – Ministerio de Defensa Nacional; De Volkskrant; ecoi.net; The Economist; El Espectador; Fundación Paz y Reconciliación; Human Rights Watch; Instituto de Estudios para el Desarrollo y la Paz; IRIN; Miami Herald; The New York Times; Radio France internationale; Semana; Time Magazine; UN – UN News; US – Department of State; Washington Office on Latin America.

Attachment

InSight Crime. 1 September 2017. "Dissident Elements and Desertions from FARC Fronts." [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018]

Copyright notice: This document is published with the permission of the copyright holder and producer Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB). The original version of this document may be found on the offical website of the IRB at http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/. Documents earlier than 2003 may be found only on Refworld.

Search Refworld

Countries