Last Updated: Friday, 19 May 2023, 07:24 GMT
Latest Refworld Updates for China RSS feed

China - flag China

Filter:
Showing 1-3 of 3 results
RRT Case No. 0901642

3 June 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Christian - Economic, social and cultural rights - Illegitimate children - One-child policy / Family planning - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Sexual and reproductive rights - Social group persecution - Statelessness - Statelessness | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0901671

2 June 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Catholic - Children's rights - Children-at-risk - Christian - Country of origin information (COI) - Grounds for persecution - Illegitimate children - One-child policy / Family planning - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Sexual and reproductive rights | Countries: Australia - China

China: I would like to get up-to-date information on the application of family planning regulations in Shandong province, firstly in relation to the impact on parents who have breached the family planning regulations and secondly in relation to the impact on the children. For example, in relation to the parents: 1. What are the penalties imposed on parents for having out-of-plan children? 2. Are these penalties imposed in practice? 3. Is there any procedure for having them waived / reduced? 4. Would the fact that the children have been born outside of China make any difference to action taken against the parents? (NB. These parents did not come to Australia as students). In relation to the child: 5. Could she get registration? 6. If so, would she suffer any penalty for having been born out-of-plan? 7. If she was considered a "black child", what would be the impact of being unregistered on her access to education, health care and so forth? 8. Any other information of relevance would be appreciated

7 September 2005 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld