Human rights / Right to life
- Amnesty International 4
- Council of Europe: European Commission on Human Rights 1
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 1
- Human Rights Watch 1
- India: Supreme Court 1
- Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre 1
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 1
- UN World Food Programme (WFP) 1
- World Organisation Against Torture 1
|
Bangladesh: Human Rights Committee Concluding
observations on the initial country report
30 March 2017 | Publisher: World Organisation Against Torture | Document type: Country Reports |
|
Bangladesh: Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee
March 2017 | Publisher: Amnesty International | Document type: Sessional Reports |
|
"No Right to Live" - "Kneecapping" and Maiming of Detainees by Bangladesh Security Forces
28 September 2016 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News |
|
Bangladesh: Authorities fail to curb brutal killing spree as LGBTI editor hacked to death
25 April 2016 | Publisher: Amnesty International | Document type: Country News |
|
The Researcher, November 2010
November 2010 | Publisher: Ireland: Refugee Documentation Centre | Document type: Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries |
|
Report of the WFP-UNHCR Joint Assessment Mission - Bangladesh : 30th May - 14th June 2010
June 2010 | Publisher: UN World Food Programme (WFP) | Document type: Country Reports |
|
Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 44 of the Convention : Convention on the Rights of the Child : concluding observations : Bangladesh
26 June 2009 | Publisher: UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) | Document type: Concluding Observations |
|
Gomes v. Sweden
7 February 2006 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Criminal justice - Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Right to family life - Right to life | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden |
|
Bangladesh: Human rights defenders under attack
23 August 2005 | Publisher: Amnesty International | Document type: Country Reports |
|
National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Arunachal Pradesh & Anr
We are a country governed by the Rule of Law. Our Constitution confers contains rights on every humanbeing and certain other rights on citizens. Every person is entitled to equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. So also, no person can be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Thus the State is bound to protect the life and liberty of every human-being, be he a citizen or otherwise, and it cannot permit any body or group of persons, e.g., the AAPSU, to threaten the Chakmas to leave the State, failing which they would be forced to do so. No State Government worth the name can tolerate such threats by one group of persons to another group of persons; it is duty bound to protect the threatened group from such assaults and if it fails to do so, it will fail to perform its Constitutional as well as statutory obligations. Those giving such threats would be liable to be dealt with in accordance with law. The State Government must act impartially and carry out its legal obligations to safeguard the life, health and well-being of Chakmas residing in the State without being inhibited by local politics. Besides, by refusing to forward their applications, the Chakmas are denied rights, Constitutional and statutory, to be considered for being registered as citizens of India. 9 January 1996 | Judicial Body: India: Supreme Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Chakma - Citizenship / Nationality law - Constitutional law - Right to life - Rights of non-citizens - State protection | Countries: Bangladesh - India |
