Bangladesh
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK)
- Amnesty International - Bangladesh
- Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
- Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Bangladesh
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Bangladesh
- Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) - Bangladesh
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) - Bangladesh
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC in Bangladesh
- International Crisis Group (ICG) - Bangladesh
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Bangladesh
- Laws of Bangladesh
- National Web Portal of Bangladesh
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Bangladesh
- ReliefWeb - Bangladesh
- UNHCR - Bangladesh
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Bangladesh
- United States Department of State - Bangladesh
- World Food Programme (WFP) - Bangladesh
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Bangladesh
|
AATA Case No. 1606601
14 September 2016 | Judicial Body: Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Citizenship / Nationality law - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Rohingya (Arakanese) - Statelessness | Countries: Australia - Bangladesh |
|
"The Government Could Have Stopped This"
Sectarian Violence and Ensuing Abuses in Burma's Arakan State
1 August 2012 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country Reports |
|
CORI Country Report: Bangladesh
March 2012 | Publisher: Country of Origin Research and Information (CORI) | Document type: Country Reports |
|
National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Arunachal Pradesh & Anr
We are a country governed by the Rule of Law. Our Constitution confers contains rights on every humanbeing and certain other rights on citizens. Every person is entitled to equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. So also, no person can be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Thus the State is bound to protect the life and liberty of every human-being, be he a citizen or otherwise, and it cannot permit any body or group of persons, e.g., the AAPSU, to threaten the Chakmas to leave the State, failing which they would be forced to do so. No State Government worth the name can tolerate such threats by one group of persons to another group of persons; it is duty bound to protect the threatened group from such assaults and if it fails to do so, it will fail to perform its Constitutional as well as statutory obligations. Those giving such threats would be liable to be dealt with in accordance with law. The State Government must act impartially and carry out its legal obligations to safeguard the life, health and well-being of Chakmas residing in the State without being inhibited by local politics. Besides, by refusing to forward their applications, the Chakmas are denied rights, Constitutional and statutory, to be considered for being registered as citizens of India. 9 January 1996 | Judicial Body: India: Supreme Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Chakma - Citizenship / Nationality law - Constitutional law - Right to life - Rights of non-citizens - State protection | Countries: Bangladesh - India |
|
Bangladesh Citizenship (Temporary Provisions) Rules, 1978
1978 | Publisher: National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities | Document type: National Legislation |
|
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Citizenship (Temporary Provisions) Order, 1972
26 March 1971 | Publisher: National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities | Document type: National Decrees, Circulars, Regulation, Policy Documents |
|
Bangladesh: The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 1951
13 April 1951 | Publisher: National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities | Document type: National Legislation |
|
Naturalization Act, 1926
26 February 1926 | Publisher: National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities | Document type: National Legislation |
