Immigration law / Expulsion
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights 2
- African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights 1
- Australia: Federal Court 1
- Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal 1
- Austria: Constitutional Court of Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof) 1
- Belgium: Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers 4
- Belgium: Cour de cassation 1
- Bolivia: Tribunal Constitucional 1
- Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario 1
- Canada: Courts of Appeal 1
- Canada: Federal Court 4
- Canada: Federal Court of Appeal 4
- Canada: Supreme Court 1
- Costa Rica: Corte Suprema de Justicia 9
- Council of Europe 1
- Council of Europe: European Commission on Human Rights 35
- Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights 1
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 145
- Czech Republic: Constitutional Court 1
- Ecuador: Corte Constitucional 2
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 2
- France: Conseil d'Etat 2
- Greece: Council of State 5
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) 1
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACrtHR) 4
- Ireland: High Court 1
- Italy: Courts of First Instance 1
- Italy: Italian Supreme Court (Corte Suprema di Cassazione) 2
- New Zealand: Court of Appeal 1
- Norway: Supreme Court 2
- Poland: Provincial (Voivodship) Administrative Court 1
- Russian Federation: City Courts 1
- Switzerland: Federal Court 8
- Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral 2
- UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) 100
- UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) 1
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 1
- UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 15
- United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority 1
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 5
- United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) 1
- United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) 4
- United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee) 1
- United Kingdom: Privy Council (Judicial Committee) 1
- United Kingdom: Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) 1
- United States Board of Immigration Appeals 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2
- Afghanistan 17
- Algeria 15
- Angola 1
- Australia 11
- Austria 9
- Azerbaijan 5
- Bangladesh 12
- Belarus 2
- Belgium 10
- Bhutan 2
- Bolivia 1
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 1
- Bulgaria 9
- Canada 24
- Cape Verde 1
- Chad 1
- Chile 1
- China 4
- Colombia 8
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the 4
- Costa Rica 11
- Côte d'Ivoire 2
- Cuba 2
- Czech Republic 3
- Denmark 11
- Djibouti 2
- Dominican Republic 4
- Ecuador 2
- Egypt 3
- El Salvador 2
- Eritrea 3
- Ethiopia 4
- Falkland Islands 1
- Finland 3
- France 16
- Gambia 2
- Georgia 5
- Germany 12
- Greece 18
- Guinea 1
- Haiti 1
- Hungary 9
- India 6
- Iran, Islamic Republic of 26
- Iraq 6
- Ireland 2
- Italy 26
- Jordan 2
- Kenya 2
- Kyrgyzstan 2
- Latvia 1
- Lebanon 3
- Libya 3
- Lithuania 2
- Madagascar 1
- Mali 3
- Malta 1
- Mauritania 2
- Mexico 4
- Moldova, Republic of 2
- Montenegro 1
- Morocco 5
- Myanmar 2
- Netherlands 33
- Netherlands Antilles 1
- New Zealand 1
- Nicaragua 1
- Nigeria 8
- North Macedonia 4
- Norway 7
- Pakistan 10
- Palestine, State of 6
- Panama 1
- Peru 1
- Philippines 1
- Poland 6
- Romania 10
- Russian Federation 27
- Rwanda 1
- Serbia 8
- Sierra Leone 2
- Slovakia 3
- Somalia 11
- South Sudan 1
- Spain 6
- Sri Lanka 24
- Sudan 7
- Sweden 47
- Switzerland 43
- Syrian Arab Republic 13
- Tajikistan 3
- Tanzania, United Republic of 2
- Togo 2
- Tunisia 21
- Türkiye 25
- Uganda 2
- Ukraine 2
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 23
- United States of America 7
- Uzbekistan 9
- Venezuela 1
- Viet Nam 2
- Zambia 1
|
AFFAIRE R.M. ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE (Requête no 11247/18)
9 February 2023 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Children's rights - Expulsion - Right to liberty and security - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Poland - Russian Federation |
|
CASE OF T.Z. AND OTHERS v. POLAND
(Application no. 41764/17)
The present case concerns numerous refusals of the Polish authorities to examine the applicants’ requests for international protection, their denied entry to Poland and return to Belarus 13 October 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Effective remedy - Entry / Exit - Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Belarus - Poland - Russian Federation |
|
CASE OF T.Z. AND OTHERS v. POLAND
(Application no. 41764/17)
The present case concerns numerous refusals of the Polish authorities to examine the applicants’ requests for international protection, their denied entry to Poland and return to Belarus. 13 October 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion | Countries: Poland - Russian Federation |
|
CASE OF H.K. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 18531/17)
The applicant complained that he had been part of a collective expulsion on 3 September 2016, in violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention. He further complained under Article 13 of the Convention, that he had had no remedy at his disposal that would have enabled him to complain of a violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention. 22 September 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion | Countries: Hungary - Iran, Islamic Republic of - Serbia |
|
AFFAIRE M.A.M. c. SUISSE (Requête no 29836/20)
1. La requête concerne le possible renvoi au Pakistan du requérant, ressortissant de ce pays, s’étant converti de l’islam au christianisme en Suisse, suite au rejet de sa demande d’asile. Le requérant se plaint que son renvoi lui ferait courir un risque réel pour sa vie ou d’être soumis à des mauvais traitements et que sa liberté de religion serait considérablement entravée. 26 April 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion - Freedom of religion - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Pakistan - Switzerland |
|
CASE OF N.K. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 45761/18)
1. The case concerns removal of the applicant to Tajikistan, in breach of an interim measure issued by the Court, and the conditions and lawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending removal. Articles 3, 5 and 34 of the Convention are, principally, invoked. 29 March 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Expulsion - Extradition - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Russian Federation - Tajikistan |
|
CASE OF T.K. AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA (Application no. 55978/20)
22 March 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: Lithuania - Tajikistan |
|
CASE OF SHENTURK AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (Applications nos. 41326/17 and other applications
– see appended list)
10 March 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Expulsion - Extradition - Non-refoulement | Countries: Azerbaijan - Türkiye |
|
K v Landkreis Gifhorn, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover, Case C-519/20
La demande de décision préjudicielle porte sur l’interprétation de l’article 16, paragraphe 1, et de l’article 18 de la directive 2008/115/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil, du 16 décembre 2008, relative aux normes et procédures communes applicables dans les États membres au retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier (JO 2008, L 348, p. 98). 10 March 2022 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2008 Returns Directive (EU) | Topic(s): Emergency legislation - Expulsion - Prison or detention conditions | Countries: Germany - Pakistan |
|
NANCY GIMENA HUISHA-HUISHA, AND HER MINOR CHILD, ET AL., APPELLEES v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL.,
APPELLANTS
It is likely that § 265 grants the Executive sweeping authority to prohibit aliens from entering the United States during a public-health emergency; that the Executive may expel aliens who violate such a prohibition; and that under § 1231(b)(3)(A) and the Convention Against Torture, the Executive cannot expel aliens to countries where their “life or freedom would be threatened” on account of their “race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion” or where they will likely face torture. 4 March 2022 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | Topic(s): COVID-19 - Deportation / Forcible return - Expulsion - Public health | Countries: United States of America |
