United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Case Law 1
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - United Kingdom
- Asylum and Immigration Tribunal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (AIT)
- Border and Immigration Agency, Home Office of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Commonwealth and International Human Rights Case Law Database
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Defence Academy of the United Kingdom
- Electronic Immigration Network
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - United Kingdom
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - United Kingdom
- Immigration Advisory Service
- Independent Race and Refugee News Network (IRR)
- Information Centre about Asylum and Refugees (ICAR)
- Institute for Public Policy Research
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC mission in London
- International Conflict Research Institute (INCORE)
- Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JCWI
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Metropolitan Support Trust: Refugee Support
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Overseas Development Institute (ODI)
- Refugee Council
- ReliefWeb - Channel Islands
- ReliefWeb - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
- Save the Children UK
- Stonewall
- The Guardian
- UNHCR - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- UTIAC Reported Determinations Database
- United Kingdom House of Lords Judgments: archive
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - United Kingdom
- United States Department of State - United Kingdom
- Women Asylum Seekers Together (WAST)
- World Health Organization (WHO) - United Kingdom
|
R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2021] UKSC 38
The issues in the appeal are (1) whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in assessing the lawfulness of the policy guidance by reference to whether it (a) created a real risk of more than a minimal number of children being detained, and/or (b) created a risk which could be avoided if the terms of the policy were better formulated; and (2) whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that criterion C, as construed in the context of the relevant policy as a whole, is unlawful. 30 July 2021 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Supreme Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Asylum policy - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) | Countries: Eritrea - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
