Netherlands
- Council of Europe: Commissioner for Human Rights 1
- Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights 1
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 1
- European Council on Refugees and Exiles 6
- European Migration Network (EMN) 1
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 2
- European Union: European Agency for Fundamental Rights 1
- Netherlands, The: The Hague District Court 2
- Odysseus - Academic Network for Legal Studies on Immigration 1
- Overseas Development Institute (ODI) 1
- UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) 3
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Netherlands
- Amnesty International Netherlands
- Centre for Migration Law (CMR), Radboud University Nijmegen
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Dutch Refugee Council
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Netherlands
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Netherlands
- Immigration and Naturalization Service of the Netherlands
- Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies (IMES), University of Amsterdam
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC delegation in Brussels
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Netherlands
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
- Ministry of Security and Justice of the Netherlands
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Netherlands
- ReliefWeb - Netherlands (the)
- The Hague Justice Portal
- UNHCR - Netherlands
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Netherlands
- United States Department of State - Netherlands
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Netherlands
|
TQ v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, Case C‑441/19, request for preliminary ruling
1. Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in conjunction with Article 5(a) of that directive and Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that, before issuing a return decision against an unaccompanied minor, the Member State concerned must carry out a general and in-depth assessment of the situation of that minor, taking due account of the best interests of the child. In this context, that Member State must ensure that adequate reception facilities are available for the unaccompanied minor in question in the State of return. 2. Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/115, read in conjunction with Article 5(a) of that directive and in the light of Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State may not distinguish between unaccompanied minors solely on the basis of the criterion of their age for the purpose of ascertaining whether there are adequate reception facilities in the State of return. 3. Article 8(1) of Directive 2008/115 must be interpreted as precluding a Member State, after it has adopted a return decision in respect of an unaccompanied minor and has been satisfied, in accordance with Article 10(2) of that directive, that that minor will be returned to a member of his or her family, a nominated guardian or adequate reception facilities in the State of return, from refraining from subsequently removing that minor until he or she reaches the age of 18 years. 14 January 2021 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2008 Returns Directive (EU) | Topic(s): Children's rights - Deportation / Forcible return - Reception - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: Guinea - Netherlands |
|
Rechtbank Den Haag, 24-01-2018 / AWB - 17 _ 13382
articles 5 and 7(1)(h) 2005 Regulation on benefits for asylum seekers and other categories of foreigners contrary to EU law 12 March 2018 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: The Hague District Court | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Recast Asylum Procedures Directive (EU) | Topic(s): Exhaustion of domestic remedies - Reception | Countries: Netherlands |
|
K. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
14 September 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Immigration Detention - Proof of nationality - Reception - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to liberty and security | Countries: Iran, Islamic Republic of - Netherlands |
|
Current migration situation in the EU: Oversight of
reception facilities
September 2017 | Publisher: European Union: European Agency for Fundamental Rights | Document type: Regional Reports |
|
Asylum Information Database, National Country Report : The Netherlands
31 December 2016 | Publisher: European Council on Refugees and Exiles | Document type: Country Reports |
|
The length of asylum procedures in Europe
October 2016 | Publisher: European Council on Refugees and Exiles | Document type: Thematic Reports |
|
Overview on UNHCR's operations Regional update - Europe
28 September 2016 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Regional Reports |
|
Untangling the data: Assessing the accuracy of
official refugee-related costs in Europe
September 2016 | Publisher: Overseas Development Institute (ODI) | Document type: Regional Reports |
|
A.M.E. v. the Netherlands
5 February 2015 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Decision on admissibility - Reception - Safe third country | Countries: Italy - Netherlands - Somalia |
|
Asylum Information Database, National Country Report : The Netherlands
May 2014 | Publisher: European Council on Refugees and Exiles | Document type: Country Reports |
