Last Updated: Thursday, 29 September 2022, 11:15 GMT
Refworld Home
Latest Refworld Updates for Netherlands RSS feed

Netherlands - flag Netherlands

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Filter:
Showing 51-60 of 930 results
2018 Trafficking in Persons Report - Aruba

28 June 2018 | Publisher: United States Department of State | Document type: Annual Reports

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL MENGOZZI in case C-380/17 Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, K, B joined party H. Y., (2) Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(1) The Court has jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the referring court which relate to the interpretation of the provisions of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification in a case concerning the right of residence of a member of the family of a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, where the provisions of that directive have been declared directly and unconditionally applicable to the beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status in national law. (2) The system provided for under Directive 2003/86 precludes a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which an application for family reunification on the basis of the more favourable provisions of Chapter V of that directive can be rejected for the sole reason that it was not submitted within the three-month period laid down in the third subparagraph of Article 12(1) of that directive, since that period cannot be regarded as a time bar and that application must be considered in the light of Article 7 and Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which require the Member States to examine applications for family reunification in the interests of the children concerned, with a view to promoting family life and preventing both the objective and the effectiveness of Directive 2003/86 from being undermined. In addition, the failure to have regard to the guiding principles of that directive in the event of the rejection of an application for family reunification for the purposes of Article 12 thereof because the three-month period provided for in the third subparagraph of paragraph 1 of that article is exceeded cannot be justified by the fact that the examination of another application submitted under Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/86 would take account of those guiding principles.

27 June 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Family reunification - Right to family life | Countries: Netherlands

Pride or Shame: Assessing LGBTI Asylum Applications in the Netherlands Following the XYZ and ABC Judgments

June 2018 | Publisher: COC Netherlands | Document type: Thematic Reports

K. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C‑331/16), and H. F. v Belgische Staat (C‑366/16) (reference for preliminary ruling)

interpretation of the second subparagraph of Article 27(2), Article 28(1) and Article 28(3)(a) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States

2 May 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Exclusion clauses - National security / Public order | Countries: Afghanistan - Belgium - Bosnia and Herzegovina - Croatia - Netherlands

A. and S. v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, C 550/16

Article 2(f) of Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, read in conjunction with Article 10(3)(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that a third-country national or stateless person who is below the age of 18 at the time of his or her entry into the territory of a Member State and of the introduction of his or her asylum application in that State, but who, in the course of the asylum procedure, attains the age of majority and is thereafter granted refugee status must be regarded as a ‘minor’ for the purposes of that provision.

12 April 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Family reunification - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: Eritrea - Netherlands

World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Netherlands : Frisians

April 2018 | Publisher: Minority Rights Group International | Document type: Country Reports

World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Netherlands : Muslims

April 2018 | Publisher: Minority Rights Group International | Document type: Country Reports

World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Netherlands : Moluccans

April 2018 | Publisher: Minority Rights Group International | Document type: Country Reports

World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Netherlands

April 2018 | Publisher: Minority Rights Group International | Document type: Country Profiles

Applicant v. State Secretary for Security and Justice

Whether the general security situation in Afghanistan, in particular in Ghazni, is so bad that the applicant cannot return for that reason: Although the security situation in some provinces is more worrisome than in others, the situation in Afghanistan is not as such that a citizen who is not at all connected to one of the warring parties merely because of his presence there runs a real risk of a threat referred to in Article 29, first paragraph, preamble and under b, part 3, of the Vw 2000

21 March 2018 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Countries: Afghanistan - Netherlands

Search Refworld

Advanced Search | Search Tips
UNHCR logo