UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
Case of O.M. and D.S. v. Ukraine (Application no. 18603/12)
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,Joins to the merits the Government’s objection as to the first applicant’s victim status regarding her complaint under Article 3 of the Convention and rejects it; Declares the first applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning her removal from Ukraine and the alleged lack of effective domestic remedies in that regard admissible and the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 13 inadmissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the first applicant’s complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that the respondent State has failed to comply with its obligation under Article 34 of the Convention 15 September 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Non-refoulement - Rejection at border | Countries: Kyrgyzstan - Ukraine |
UNHCR Submission for the Universal Periodic Review – Kyrgyzstan – UPR 35th Session (2019)
July 2019 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country Reports |
Transnational Injustices - National Security Transfers and International Law
15 September 2017 | Publisher: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) | Document type: International Legal Instruments |
China: Security group stokes abuses
4 September 2012 | Publisher: Radio Free Asia | Document type: Country News |
Kyrgyzstan: Asylum Seekers Feared Returned to Abuse in Uzbekistan
4 August 2009 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News |
People's Republic of China: Uighurs fleeing persecution as China wages its "war on terror"
7 July 2004 | Publisher: Amnesty International | Document type: Country Reports |