Myanmar

Appeal / Right to appeal 1
Arbitrary arrest and detention 20
Armed forces / Military 1
Asylum-migration nexus 1
Asylum-seekers 5
Benefit of the doubt 1
Burden of proof 2
Burden-sharing and international co-operation 1
Changes of circumstances in home country 1
Child soldiers 2
Children's rights 3
Children-at-risk 2
Chin 2
Christian 5
Citizenship / Nationality law 6
Civil and political rights 3
Communal conflict / Social conflict 2
Conflict resolution 1
Constitutional law 1
Convention against Torture (CAT) 1
Country of origin information (COI) 14
Credibility assessment 6
Crimes against humanity 1
Criminal justice 5
Democracy 1
Deportation / Forcible return 5
Disappeared persons 3
Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity 3
EU Qualification Directive 1
Economic, social and cultural rights 1
Effective protection 1
Effective remedy 1
Elections 3
Emergency legislation 1
Entry / Exit 2
Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) 6
Exclusion clauses 5
Expulsion 2
Extradition 1
Extrajudicial executions 2
False documents 1
Falun Gong 1
Family reunification 1
Flight by land, air or sea 1
Forced labour 2
Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 11
Freedom of assembly and association 15
Freedom of expression 22
Freedom of information 12
Freedom of movement 6
Freedom of religion 2
Freedom of speech 9
Fresh / New claim 2
Habeas corpus 1
Hindu 1
Human Rights Council 4
Human rights activists 1
Human rights and fundamental freedoms 37
Human rights monitors 2
IDP camps 1
Illegal entry 1
Illegal immigrants / Undocumented migrants 1
Immigrants 2
Immigration law 5
Impunity 5
Independence of judiciary 2
Internal armed conflict 1
Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) 1
Internally displaced persons (IDPs) 2
International criminal law 1
International protection 1
Kachin 3
Karen 3
Laws relating to religion 3
Location of camps 1
Migrants 1
Minorities 2
Multiple nationality 1
Muslim 1
Non-refoulement 7
One-child policy / Family planning 1
Opposition 2
Passports 2
Persecution based on political opinion 34
Persecution of family members 3
Political parties 1
Political situation 4
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 1
Pre-trial detention 2
Prison or detention conditions 3
Proof of nationality 4
Protection of civilian persons in time of war 1
Public health 1
Racial / Ethnic persecution 10
Reception 2
Reconciliation 2
Refoulement 2
Refugee camps 1
Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures 2
Refugees 2
Regional instruments 2
Registration 2
Rejected asylum-seekers 2
Religious discrimination 1
Religious persecution (including forced conversion) 5
Resettlement 1
Residence permits / Residency 1
Right to employment 4
Right to liberty and security 1
Right to life 4
Rohingya (Arakanese) 9
Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness 5
Safe third country 1
Secondary movement 1
Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) 9
Smuggling of persons 1
Social group persecution 4
State protection 1
Statelessness 3
Sur place persecution 2
Tamil 1
Trafficking in persons 3
Travel documents 1
Unlawful departure 3
Visas 1
Voluntary repatriation 1
Well-founded fear of persecution 2
Witnesses 1
Women's rights 1
Women-at-risk 1

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Filter:

Showing 1-10 of 135 results

[email protected] BINTI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ & Anor v. COMMANDANT, IMMIGRATION DEPOT BELANTIK, KEDAH & Anor this Court is of the view that the continued detention of the Applicants at the Belantik Immigration Detention Centre is a direct violation of their rights as a child pursuant to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Child Act 2001 which guarantees protection and assistance to be given to children in all circumstances without regard to race, colour, gender, language, religion or distinction of any kind; Based on these reasons, and with the powers vested upon the High Court, I accept the alternative prayer of the Applicants that they are allowed to be placed at a shelter which can protect and provide the necessary welfare to them. September 2018 \| Judicial Body: Malaysia: High Court of Malaya \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Children's rights - Habeas corpus \| Countries: Malaysia - Myanmar
OO (Burma -TS remains appropriate CG) Burma [2018] UKUT 00052 (IAC) 1. Whether there has been a change of conditions in Burma to justify a departure from the country guidance in TS. 2. Second, whether this appellant is reasonably likely to be at prospective risk in Burma, given his particular political profile and likely political activities in Burma, in light of TS and / or the updated country conditions. 3. Third, and in the alternative, whether the appellant would be unable to renew his passport or obtain a certificate of identity (‘CoI’) from the Burmese Embassy, with the result that he would be detained on return to Burma. 9 January 2018 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) \| Topic(s): Changes of circumstances in home country - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) \| Countries: Myanmar - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
N.V.H. v Minister for Justice & Equality 30 June 2017 \| Judicial Body: Ireland: Supreme Court \| Document type: Case Law \| Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) \| Topic(s): Entry / Exit - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to employment \| Countries: Ireland - Myanmar
Refugee and Migratory Movements Research Unit (RMMRU) v. Government of Bangladesh 31 May 2017 \| Judicial Body: Bangladesh: Supreme Court \| Document type: Case Law \| Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Non-refoulement - Refugee camps - Right to liberty and security \| Countries: Bangladesh - Myanmar
N.H.V -v- Minister for Justice & Equality and ors, [2017] IESC 35 in principle [...] in circumstances where there is no temporal limit on the asylum process, then the absolute prohibition on seeking of employment contained in s.9(4) ( and re-enacted in s.16(3)(b) of the 2015 Act ) is contrary to the constitutional right to seek employment 30 May 2017 \| Judicial Body: Ireland: Supreme Court \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Right to employment \| Countries: Ireland - Myanmar
Situation of human rights in Myanmar : resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council 3 April 2017 \| Publisher: UN Human Rights Council \| Document type: Resolutions/Recommendations/Declarations
Myanmar: Telecommunications Law, 2013 March 2017 \| Publisher: Article 19 \| Document type: Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries
Myanmar: Draft Interfaith Harmonious Coexistence Law December 2016 \| Publisher: Article 19 \| Document type: Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries
Myanmar: Interfaith Harmonious Coexistence Law (Draft) December 2016 \| Publisher: Article 19 \| Document type: Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries
Myanmar: IDP Sites in Kachin and northern Shan States (Nov 2016) (A0 detailed version) 30 November 2016 \| Publisher: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) \| Document type: Maps

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips