India: Reject death penalty for child rape cases, focus on ending impunity for sexual violence
| Publisher | International Federation for Human Rights |
| Publication Date | 4 May 2018 |
| Cite as | International Federation for Human Rights, India: Reject death penalty for child rape cases, focus on ending impunity for sexual violence, 4 May 2018, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5bc83c864.html [accessed 17 October 2022] |
| Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |
04/05/2018
Press release
(New Delhi, Paris) The Indian Parliament should reject a Cabinet ordinance that would introduce the death penalty for cases of rape of girls under the age of 12, FIDH and its member organizations People's Watch and Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) said today. Parliament is likely to convene later in the summer for its monsoon session.
The ordinance, which was signed by President Ram Nath Kobind on 22 April 2018, would amend the Indian Penal Code, the Evidence Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses (POCSO) Act, and would also extend minimum prison sentences for cases of rape of women. It comes on the heels of two horrific rapes, including the brutal rape and murder of a girl child in Jammu and Kashmir State, which stirred a nationwide outcry.
Rape is an intolerable, abhorrent crime. FIDH, CHRI and People's Watch condemn attempts by certain segments of society to use the murder and rape of a child to inflame enmity between and within communities and to call for retributive justice. This distracts from the real needs, which are to ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice quickly and that the Indian criminal judicial system, from the police to prosecutors to prisons and courts, are well-equipped to investigate and prosecute offenders.
FIDH, CHRI, and People's Watch are concerned that the introduction of the death penalty could result in fewer cases being reported to authorities and victims refusing to testify under pressure, as perpetrators often come from the same communities as the victims. Official Indian government data notes that the attacker is known to the victim in 95% of cases prosecuted under the POSCO Act. There are also concerns about attempts by perpetrators to murder their victims to avoid identification, if capital punishment is introduced.
In 2015, the Law Commission of India in its 262nd report recommended the abolition of the death penalty for all crimes, except terrorism-related offenses and waging war. In addition, during its consultations, a general consensus emerged among members of the Law Commission that courts were unable to adopt a fair and non-discriminatory approach to the death penalty.
India is party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which guarantees right to life and requires a progression towards abolition of the death penalty. However, during its third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in May 2017, India refused to accept all the recommendations it received with regard to the abolition of the death penalty.
In 2017, courts in India handed down 109 death sentences, bringing the total number of prisoners on death row to 371 by the end of December 2017. No executions took place in 2016 or 2017 and the last execution in the country was in 2015.
FIDH, a member of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty (WCADP), CHRI, and People's Watch reiterate their strong opposition to the death penalty for all crimes and in all circumstances.
