UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E.
I have concluded that the evidence establishes that the children would, on a balance of probabilities, suffer serious harm if returned to their habitual residence of Kuwait. Ontario therefore may and should exercise jurisdiction to determine custody and access. I have also concluded that it was an error to order the return of the children pending the determination of their refugee claim. 29 July 2020 | Judicial Body: Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Children-at-risk - Physical harm - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Canada - Kuwait |
A.M.R.I. v. K.E.R.
2 June 2011 | Judicial Body: Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Family law - Non-refoulement - Refugee / Asylum law - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: Canada - Mexico |
Issasi v. Rosenzweig
On appeal from the order of Justice George Czutrin of the Superior Court of Justice, dated 21 September 2010. 18 April 2011 | Judicial Body: Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refugees | Countries: Canada - Mexico |