Canada
- Case Law 1
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Canada
- CERIS - The Ontario Metropolis Centre
- Canadian Council for Refugees
- Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network
- Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW)
- Canadian Voice of Women for Peace (VOW)
- Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)
- Citizenship and Immigration Canada
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Equitas, International Centre for Human Rights Education
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Canada
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Canada
- Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB)
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC in North America
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Canada
- Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Canada
- ReliefWeb - Canada
- Rights & Democracy
- School of Peace and Conflict Management, Royal Roads University
- UNHCR - Canada
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Canada
- United States Department of State - Canada
- Winnipeg Refugee Education Network (WREN)
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Canada
|
M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E.
I have concluded that the evidence establishes that the children would, on a balance of probabilities, suffer serious harm if returned to their habitual residence of Kuwait. Ontario therefore may and should exercise jurisdiction to determine custody and access. I have also concluded that it was an error to order the return of the children pending the determination of their refugee claim. 29 July 2020 | Judicial Body: Canada: Court of Appeal for Ontario | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Children-at-risk - Physical harm - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Canada - Kuwait |
