Last Updated: Thursday, 29 September 2022, 11:15 GMT
Latest Refworld Updates for China RSS feed

China - flag China

Filter:
Showing 1-10 of 293 results
D.Z. v. Switzerland

Examination of the same matter under another procedure of international investigation or settlement; non-exhaustion of domestic remedies Risk of torture upon return to country of origin; non-refoulement

31 August 2021 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1984 Convention against Torture (CAT) | Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Non-refoulement | Countries: China - Switzerland

CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (Application no. 5115/18)

The Court had therefore to examine whether any effective guarantees existed that protected the applicants against arbitrary refoulement by the Bulgarian authorities to China, be it direct or indirect. No destination country had been indicated in the initial decisions for the applicants’ repatriation or in the expulsion decisions. According to the Supreme Administrative Court, the determination of such a country and the assessment of any risk the applicants would face if returned to China fell to be carried out in the process of implementation of the expulsion decisions. However, such an approach offered no guarantees that the Bulgarian authorities would examine with the necessary rigour the question of the risk the applicants would face if returned to the country they had fled. It was unclear by reference to what standards and on the basis of what information the authorities would determine, if at all, the relevant risk. Lastly, there was no indication as to whether, if the authorities chose to send the applicants to a third country, they would properly examine whether they would in turn be sent from there to China without due consideration for the risk of ill‑treatment and even death. In sum, there were no effective guarantees, in the process of implementation of the repatriation or the expulsion decisions against the applicants, that they would not be sent back to China.

20 February 2020 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Uighur | Countries: Bulgaria - China

"Eradicating Ideological Viruses": China's Campaign of Repression Against Xinjiang's Muslims

9 September 2018 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country Reports

China: Release Gravely Ill Critics

17 November 2017 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

Interpol: Address China's 'Red Notice' Abuses

25 September 2017 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

China: Protect 15 Detained North Koreans

8 August 2017 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

Egypt: Don't Deport Uyghurs to China

7 July 2017 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

China: End Restrictions on Gravely Ill Nobel Laureate

30 June 2017 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country News

"Special Measures" - Detention and Torture in the Chinese Communist Party's Shuanggui System

6 December 2016 | Publisher: Human Rights Watch | Document type: Country Reports

China: Three human rights defenders held in unknown locations, 'at risk of torture'

1 December 2016 | Publisher: Radio Free Asia | Document type: Country News

Search Refworld