Protection
- Complementary forms of protection 420
- Convention Plus 41
- Diplomatic assurances 51
- Diplomatic protection 10
- Effective protection 730
- Extended definition 22
- Global Consultations on international protection 122
- Good offices 68
- High Commissioner's Dialogue on Protection Challenges 36
- High Commissioner's Forum 33
- Humanitarian protection (including tolerated stay) 55
- International protection 1,476
- Non-refoulement 791
- State protection 1,799
- Temporary protection 323
- UNHCR mandate 97
|
H46-11 Ilias and Ahmed group v. Hungary (Application No. 47287/15) - Supervision of the execution of the European Court's judgments
22 September 2022 | Publisher: Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers | Document type: Decisions |
|
Case of O.M. and D.S. v. Ukraine (Application no. 18603/12)
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,Joins to the merits the Government’s objection as to the first applicant’s victim status regarding her complaint under Article 3 of the Convention and rejects it; Declares the first applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning her removal from Ukraine and the alleged lack of effective domestic remedies in that regard admissible and the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 13 inadmissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the first applicant’s complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that the respondent State has failed to comply with its obligation under Article 34 of the Convention 15 September 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Non-refoulement - Rejection at border | Countries: Kyrgyzstan - Ukraine |
|
International Protection Considerations with Regard to People Fleeing Somalia
September 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country/Situation Specific Position Papers |
|
Recommendations
by the
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ('UNHCR')
concerning the execution of the judgments of the
European Court of Human Rights in the cases of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (Application No. 47287/15; Grand Chamber judgment of 21 November 2019) and Shahzad v. Hungary (Application No. 12625/17; Judgment of 8 July 2021)
31 August 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Resolutions/Recommendations/Declarations |
|
UNHCR comments
on the draft Law amending the Law on Aliens
14 June 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Comments on National Legislation |
|
Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection
10 June 2022 | Publisher: United States President | Document type: Resolutions/Recommendations/Declarations |
|
Guide on Article 4 of Protocol No. 4
to the European Convention
on Human Rights - Prohibition of collective
expulsions of aliens
30 April 2022 | Publisher: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law Compilations/Analyses |
|
MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Appellant and MARIA CAMILA GALINDO CAMAYO Respondent and
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES and
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS
Interveners
Is it reasonable for the RPD to rely upon evidence of the refugee’s lack of subjective [let alone any] knowledge that use of a passport confers diplomatic protection to rebut the presumption that a refugee who acquires and travels on a passport issued by their country of origin has intended to avail themselves of that state’s protection? Yes. Is it reasonable for the RPD to rely upon evidence that a refugee took measures to protect themselves against their agent of persecution [or that of their family member who is the principal refugee applicant] to rebut the presumption that a refugee who acquires [or renews] a passport issued by their country of origin and uses it to return to their country of origin has intended to avail themselves of that state’s protection? Yes. 29 March 2022 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court of Appeal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Cessation clauses - Diplomatic protection - Passports | Countries: Canada - Colombia |
|
UNHCR Comments on the Urgency Law for Ukrainians (Proposal no. 145)
14 March 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Comments on National Legislation |
|
Submission by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
in the case of 2021KuHap78282 before the Seoul Administrative Court
14 March 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
