Case Law
- Australia: Federal Court 1
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 1
- New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority 2
- South Africa: High Court 1
- United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority 8
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 1
- United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) 1
- United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) 2
- United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1
|
Teweldbrhan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Application for review of two decisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board. Review granted on basis the Board's finding was unreasonable as it lacked due regard to Ugandas decision to grant refugee status to the applicants and irrelevant and credibility findings were found for one applicant. 29 March 2012 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Countries: Canada - Eritrea |
|
R (on the application of Tesfamichael) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
Application for judicial review. Subsequently appeal before the Court of Appeal a href="?docid=4c1f856d2&page=search"> [2010] EWCA Civ 643. 19 December 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Convention refugee - Deportation / Forcible return - Non-refoulement - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
