Bulgaria

Annual Reports 233
Bilateral Treaties/Agreements 2
Case Law 73
Case Law Compilations/Analyses 1
Chronologies of Events 2
Comments on National Legislation 1
Compilations 3
Concluding Observations 14
Country News 133
Country Operations Plans 4
Country Profiles 3
Country Reports 161
Country/Situation Specific Position Papers 9
Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae 1
Decisions 2
General Comments/Recommendations 2
Legal Articles/Analyses/Commentaries 5
Maps 12
Multilateral Treaties/Agreements 1
National Decrees, Circulars, Regulation, Policy Documents 6
National Legislation 28
National Legislation Compilations/Analyses 1
Policy/Position Papers 1
Query Responses 571
Regional Legislation 1
Regional Reports 17
Research, Background and Discussion Papers 6
Resolutions/Recommendations/Declarations 3
Sessional Reports 3
Speeches/Statements 5
States Parties Reports 26
Thematic Reports 24
UNHCR Country Updates 8

1951 Refugee Convention 3
Abduction 1
Abuse of psychiatry 1
Access to procedures 13
Acts of persecution 1
Administrative law 2
Africans 1
Ahmadis 2
Airports 3
Aliens 3
Appeal / Right to appeal 6
Arabs 2
Arbitrary arrest and detention 33
Armed forces / Military 11
Armed groups / Militias / Paramilitary forces / Resistance movements 4
Armenian 6
Arrival 7
Assemblies of God 1
Asylum policy 24
Asylum-migration nexus 7
Asylum-seekers 66
Baha'i 2
Bail 1
Baptist 4
Border controls 15
Border crossers 5
Bulgarians 12
Burden of proof 1
Burden-sharing and international co-operation 8
Camp management 1
Catholic 11
Cessation clauses 4
Changes of circumstances in home country 2
Chechen 2
Child labour 14
Child prostitution 15
Child soldiers 3
Children's rights 55
Children-at-risk 30
Christian 13
Citizenship / Nationality law 4
Civil and political rights 3
Climate change (including environmental migrants) 1
Communal conflict / Social conflict 1
Complementary forms of protection 3
Conflict situation 1
Constitutional law 3
Convention against Torture (CAT) 3
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) 6
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 4
Convention refugee 1
Corruption 39
Country of origin information (COI) 8
Credibility assessment 8
Crime prevention 2
Criminal justice 35
Death in custody 2
Decision on admissibility 2
Demobilization / Disarmament 2
Democracy 9
Denial of refugee status 3
Deportation / Forcible return 26
Diplomatic asylum 1
Disappeared persons 15
Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity 136
Domestic violence 11
Drug trafficking 1
EU Qualification Directive 6
Economic, social and cultural rights 25
Effective protection 4
Effective remedy 19
Elections 41
Emigrants 2
Equal opportunities 2
Equality before the law 8
Evangelical 11
Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) 7
Exclusion clauses 2
Exhaustion of domestic remedies 1
Exiles 4
Expulsion 14
Extradition 4
Extrajudicial executions 18
Extreme poverty 2
False documents 4
Family reunification 8
Female genital mutilation (FGM) 1
Flight by land, air or sea 2
Forced labour 31
Forced marriage 3
Forced relocation 1
Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 63
Freedom of assembly and association 51
Freedom of conscience 1
Freedom of expression 133
Freedom of information 55
Freedom of movement 30
Freedom of religion 66
Freedom of speech 51
Gang related violence 1
Gender discrimination 30
Gender mainstreaming 1
Gender-based persecution 4
Good governance 15
Gross, systematic and large-scale 1
HIV and AIDS 6
Habeas corpus 1
Hare Krishna 2
Housing, land and property rights (HLP) 21
Human Rights Council 7
Human rights activists 4
Human rights and fundamental freedoms 74
Human rights courts 3
Human rights law 2
Human rights monitors 10
Humanitarian assistance 9
Humanitarian protection (including tolerated stay) 1
Illegal entry 1
Illegal immigrants / Undocumented migrants 2
Immigrants 1
Immigration Detention 27
Immigration control after entry 1
Immigration law 6
Impunity 13
Independence of judiciary 25
Indigenous persons 2
Integration 16
Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) 4
Internally displaced persons (IDPs) 5
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) 2
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) 2
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) 5
International courts and tribunals 1
International protection 7
Jehovah's Witness 7
Jew 24
Jurisdiction 1
Juvenile justice system 2
Kosovar 1
Kurd 5
Labour law 2
Legal representation / Legal aid 9
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) 27
Livelihoods 1
Lutheran 1
Macedonians 21
Mandate status 1
Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims 1
Mass exodus 1
Maternal and child health care 2
Mental harm 1
Mental health 12
Mentally disadvantaged persons 10
Migrant rights 6
Migrants 44
Military courts 4
Military operations 4
Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription 35
Minorities 66
Minority rights 26
Montenegrin 1
Mormon 5
Muslim 23
National security / Public order 9
Naturalization 6
New Life Church 1
Non-refoulement 6
Non-state agents of persecution 3
Older persons 1
Opposition 10
Orthodox Christian 17
Palestinian 1
Passports 1
Pentecostal 1
Persecution based on class/wealth/occupation 1
Persecution based on nationality 1
Persecution based on political opinion 13
Persecution of family members 3
Persecution on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity 17
Persons with disabilities 16
Police 32
Political asylum 2
Political groups 5
Political parties 17
Political situation 15
Polygamy 1
Pomaks 7
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 1
Pre-trial detention 4
Prevention of discrimination 9
Prison or detention conditions 46
Property restitution 5
Prosecution vs persecution 2
Prostitution / Commercial sex work 9
Protestant 13
Protests / Demonstrations / Riots / Civil unrest 7
Public health 10
Racial / Ethnic persecution 62
Racism / Xenophobia / Hate Crimes 17
Reception 27
Refoulement 3
Refugee / Asylum law 8
Refugee camps 3
Refugee identity documents 3
Refugee seamen 4
Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures 25
Refugees 88
Regional instruments 5
Registration 9
Reintegration 1
Rejected asylum-seekers 2
Rejection at border 8
Religious discrimination 43
Religious persecution (including forced conversion) 12
Rescue at sea / Interception at sea 1
Resettlement 8
Residence permits / Residency 8
Return conditions 3
Returnees 3
Right to a nationality 8
Right to education 30
Right to employment 10
Right to family life 10
Right to food 1
Right to health 12
Right to justice 4
Right to leave 7
Right to liberty and security 10
Right to life 7
Right to registration at birth 3
Right to return 1
Right to seek asylum 4
Right to self-determination 7
Rights of non-citizens 4
Rohingya (Arakanese) 1
Roma 123
Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness 20
Safe country of origin 2
Safe third country 6
Salafi 1
Sale of children 2
Sami 2
Secondary movement 2
Security forces 13
Security situation 7
Serb 1
Serious non-political crime 3
Seventh Day Adventist 2
Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) 44
Sexual and reproductive rights 3
Shia 3
Slavs 1
Small arms 1
Smuggling of persons 7
Social group discrimination 14
Social group persecution 3
State protection 8
Statelessness 22
Statelessness Determination Procedures 4
Sunni 8
Survivors of trafficking / Persons at risk of trafficking 12
Temporary protection 2
Terrorism 28
Threats / Intimidation 7
Torture 15
Trafficking in persons 71
Transit 1
Travel documents 2
Turkmen 1
Turks 10
UNHCR mandate 2
Uighur 1
Unaccompanied / Separated children 19
Unification Church 1
Universal Periodic Review (UPR) 12
Visas 17
Vlachs 1
Well-founded fear of persecution 3
Witnesses 5
Women's rights 39
Women-at-risk 20
Yazīdī 1

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Filter:

Showing 1-10 of 1,362 results

#IBelong Campaign Update, April-June 2022 5 August 2022 \| Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) \| Document type: Thematic Reports
#IBelong Campaign Update, October – December 2021 1 February 2022 \| Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) \| Document type: Thematic Reports
A.M. (au nom de M.K.A.H.) c. Suisse Discrimination; intérêt supérieur de l’enfant; développement de l’enfant; droit de l’enfant d’être entendu dans toute procédure judiciaire ou administrative l’intéressant; protection et assistance humanitaire voulues pour les enfants réfugiés; droit de l’enfant de jouir du meilleur état de santé possible; traitements inhumains ou dégradants 6 October 2021 \| Judicial Body: UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Children's rights - Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - Statelessness \| Countries: Bulgaria - Switzerland - Syrian Arab Republic
EASO Age assessment practices in EU+ countries: updated findings July 2021 \| Publisher: European Union: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) \| Document type: Thematic Reports
Applicant v. State Secretary for Security and Justice 19 October 2020 \| Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: The Hague District Court \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Housing, land and property rights (HLP) - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to education \| Countries: Bulgaria - Netherlands - Syrian Arab Republic
Good Practices Paper – Action 6: Establishing Statelessness Determination Procedures to Protect Stateless Persons July 2020 \| Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) \| Document type: Thematic Reports
High-Level Segment on Statelessness: Results and Highlights May 2020 \| Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) \| Document type: Thematic Reports
Campaign Update, January 2020 - March 2020 22 April 2020 \| Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) \| Document type: Country News
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (Application no. 5115/18) The Court had therefore to examine whether any effective guarantees existed that protected the applicants against arbitrary refoulement by the Bulgarian authorities to China, be it direct or indirect. No destination country had been indicated in the initial decisions for the applicants’ repatriation or in the expulsion decisions. According to the Supreme Administrative Court, the determination of such a country and the assessment of any risk the applicants would face if returned to China fell to be carried out in the process of implementation of the expulsion decisions. However, such an approach offered no guarantees that the Bulgarian authorities would examine with the necessary rigour the question of the risk the applicants would face if returned to the country they had fled. It was unclear by reference to what standards and on the basis of what information the authorities would determine, if at all, the relevant risk. Lastly, there was no indication as to whether, if the authorities chose to send the applicants to a third country, they would properly examine whether they would in turn be sent from there to China without due consideration for the risk of ill‑treatment and even death. In sum, there were no effective guarantees, in the process of implementation of the repatriation or the expulsion decisions against the applicants, that they would not be sent back to China. 20 February 2020 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Uighur \| Countries: Bulgaria - China
Arrêt F-7195/2018 du 11 février 2020 On 11 February 2020, the Swiss Federal Administrative Tribunal (TAF) ruled in case F-7195/2018 concerning the Dublin transfer of an asylum seeker to Bulgaria that there are no systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions for applicants in Bulgaria, and that there is no reason for a complete suspension of Dublin transfers to Bulgaria. The court ruled that the Swiss asylum authority SEM should assess on a case-to-case basis whether a Dublin transfer must be suspended. This examination could include obtaining concrete and prior guarantees from the Bulgarian authorities. A transfer is only possible if the possibility that the asylum-seeker concerned would be subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment on his return to Bulgaria is excluded. In this particular case, the appeal against the transfer decision was made by the applicant, arguing that she suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder which could not be treated adequately in Bulgaria, that she risked not being able to access the regular reception services due to the fact that her asylum application had already been rejected by the Bulgarian authorities, that she even risked being detained and subjected to inhuman conditions and that she finally risked being returned to her country of origin contrary to the principle of non-refoulement. Taking her particular circumstances into account, the TAF quashed the transfer decision and upheld the appeal, ruling that even though there are no systemic deficiencies in the asylum system in Bulgaria, the transfer decision should be based on a detailed analysis of all relevant circumstances of the asylum seeker. 11 February 2020 \| Judicial Body: Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - Reception - Rejected asylum-seekers \| Countries: Bulgaria - Sri Lanka - Switzerland

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips