Title | L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland |
Publisher | European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union |
Publication Date | 20 May 2021 |
Country | Germany | Islamic Republic of Iran |
Topics | Access to procedures | Secondary movement |
Citation / Document Symbol | ECLI:EU:C:2021:404 |
Related Document(s) | EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case Cā238/19, request for preliminary ruling |
Cite as | L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ECLI:EU:C:2021:404, European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union, 20 May 2021, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECJ,60cb5e9b4.html [accessed 1 October 2022] |
Comments | On those grounds, the Court (Fourth Chamber) hereby rules: Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in conjunction with Article 2(q) thereof, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for the possibility of rejecting as inadmissible an application for international protection, within the meaning of Article 2(b) of that directive, made to that Member State by a third-country national or a stateless person whose previous application seeking the grant of refugee status, made to a third State implementing Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, in accordance with the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Iceland or Norway ā Declarations, had been rejected by that third State. |
Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |