Last Updated: Monday, 17 October 2022, 12:22 GMT

Philippines: Colorful Language but Little Action on Abu Sayyaf

Publisher Jamestown Foundation
Author Alexander Sehmer
Publication Date 30 September 2016
Citation / Document Symbol Terrorism Monitor Volume: 14 Issue: 19
Cite as Jamestown Foundation, Philippines: Colorful Language but Little Action on Abu Sayyaf , 30 September 2016, Terrorism Monitor Volume: 14 Issue: 19, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57f3b3744.html [accessed 22 October 2022]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Link to original story on Jamestown website

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte called for U.S. military advisers in the country's south to be withdrawn on September 12, arguing that they were targets for Abu Sayyaf militants operating in Mindanao (Daily Inquirer, September 13). The comments come amid a torrent of anti-American rhetoric from Duterte, which has included insulting President Barack Obama and vowing to end joint military exercises (Daily Inquirer, September 28). For all his colorful language, however, there has yet to be any official signs of disengagement with the United States (Daily Inquirer, September 29).

The ramping up of this kind of language maybe partly because Duterte is courting Chinese investment, including for a proposed railway system in Mindanao, something China appears minded to do (Manila Bulletin, August). The focus on China has even led Duterte to indicate he could set aside a longstanding dispute between the two nations over islands in the South China Sea (Daily Inquirer, February 29).

In fact, such a concessions seem unlikely as it would call into question Duterte's nationalist credentials, and row back on comments he made during his election campaign when he assured voters he would jet ski to the islands and plant his country's flag there himself (Asian Economist, April 27).

Similarly, Duterte can ill afford to have U.S. advisers pull out of Mindanao.

U.S. forces have been in Mindanao since 2002, aiding the Philippines' military in its fight against Abu Sayyaf, and while more than a decade of military operations has failed to dislodge the group, U.S. involvement has immeasurably strengthened the Philippines' military's effectiveness. Joint operations ended last year, but a small number of U.S. military advisers remain and it is these that Duterte wants removed.

Since taking up the presidency in June, Duterte has maintained a relatively conciliatory stance towards Abu Sayyaf, focusing instead on his violent and much criticized anti-drugs efforts. Now the Philippines' president appears set to change tack.

At the beginning of the month, a bombing claimed by Abu Sayyaf killed 15 people in Davao, where Duterte used to be mayor. In the aftermath of the blast, the Philippines' president, speaking from Laos where was taking part in an ASEAN meeting, vowed he would "crush" the militants and "eat" them alive (Philippine Star, September 7).

Should the Philippines' president attempt to tackle Abu Sayyaf in a similar manner to how he has dealt with drug dealers, he may feel constrained by his U.S. military allies, but such a move would surely seem unwise. Possibly Duteret's comments are simply bluster. Certainly it remains to be seen whether they herald any real change, either in relation to the U.S. advisers or in terms of his strategy for taking on the militants.

Copyright notice: © 2010 The Jamestown Foundation

Search Refworld

Countries

Topics