Ukraine
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Ukraine
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Ukraine
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Ukraine
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC regional delegation in Moscow
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Ukraine
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Ukraine
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) - Ukraine
- ReliefWeb - Ukraine
- UNHCR - Ukraine
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Ukraine
- United States Department of State - Ukraine
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Ukraine
- Харьковская правозащитная группа (ХПГ)
|
Case of O.M. and D.S. v. Ukraine (Application no. 18603/12)
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,Joins to the merits the Government’s objection as to the first applicant’s victim status regarding her complaint under Article 3 of the Convention and rejects it; Declares the first applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning her removal from Ukraine and the alleged lack of effective domestic remedies in that regard admissible and the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 13 inadmissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the first applicant’s complaint under Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that the respondent State has failed to comply with its obligation under Article 34 of the Convention 15 September 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Non-refoulement - Rejection at border | Countries: Kyrgyzstan - Ukraine |
|
Submission by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the Case of O.M. and D.S. v. Ukraine (Application No. 18603/12)
15 July 2013 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
|
Vitaliy Semenovich Kaganovich v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued and Submitted: November 17, 2006 Pasadena, California; Filed: December 12, 2006. 12 December 2006 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Exhaustion of domestic remedies - Non-refoulement | Countries: Ukraine - United States of America |
|
Vasiliy Ostapovich Romanishyn v. Attorney General
On Petition for Review of an Order of Removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals, U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review (BIA No. A71-346-048). Argued: Monday, May 15, 2006. 20 July 2006 | Judicial Body: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Criminal justice - Deportation / Forcible return - Non-refoulement - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - Witnesses | Countries: Ukraine - United States of America |
