Switzerland
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Switzerland
- Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Tribunal administratif fédéral)
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Federal Office for Migration of Switzerland: Protection from persecution/Asylum
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Switzerland
- International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC headquarters, Geneva
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Switzerland
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Switzerland
- ReliefWeb - Switzerland
- Swiss Forum for Migration and Population Studies (SFM)
- Swiss Refugee Council (SRC)
- Switzerland: State Secretariat for Migration (SEM)
- UNHCR - Switzerland
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Switzerland
- United States Department of State - Switzerland
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Switzerland
- swisspeace
|
A.M. (au nom de M.K.A.H.) c. Suisse
Discrimination; intérêt supérieur de l’enfant; développement de l’enfant; droit de l’enfant d’être entendu dans toute procédure judiciaire ou administrative l’intéressant; protection et assistance humanitaire voulues pour les enfants réfugiés; droit de l’enfant de jouir du meilleur état de santé possible; traitements inhumains ou dégradants 6 October 2021 | Judicial Body: UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) | Topic(s): Children's rights - Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - Statelessness | Countries: Bulgaria - Switzerland - Syrian Arab Republic |
|
Arrêt E-1813/2019 du 1er juillet 2020
In a landmark judgment, the Federal Administrative Court acknowledged the existence of a new specific circumstance that goes against the granting of family asylum. In addition, it considered that the result of the assessment of evidence made in the original, already concluded, asylum procedure cannot be simply transposed to the subsequent family asylum procedure. The right to be heard must be granted again and the results assessed separately. 1 July 2020 | Judicial Body: Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to family life - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: China - Switzerland |
