UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
#IBelong Campaign Update, April-June 2022
5 August 2022 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Thematic Reports |
cases nos. 202106573/1 and 202105784/1
6 July 2022 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Refoulement | Countries: Denmark - Netherlands - Syrian Arab Republic |
Decision 202102939/1/V3
State Secretary for Justice and Security must investigate whether transferring aliens to Croatia on the basis of the European Dublin Regulation is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 13 April 2022 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Countries: Croatia - Egypt - Netherlands |
Decision 202101105/1/V1
3 January 2022 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Article 1D - Palestinian - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Statelessness - UNRWA | Countries: Iraq - Netherlands |
Case of M.J. v. The Netherlands (Application no. 49259/18)
In view of the above, the Court notes that the risk of the applicant being expelled and, potentially, being exposed to a risk of treatment in breach of Article 3, has now, at least temporarily, been removed. Moreover, the Court finds that the complaints under Article 13 and on the procedural requirements of Article 3 in the present case are in essence inextricably connected to the proposed expulsion of the applicant (see Nasseri v the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24239/09, § 18, 13 October 2015, and J.W. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 16177/14, § 32, 27 June 2017). In these circumstances, the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c)). Moreover, it is satisfied that respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto, does not require a continuation of the application by virtue of Article 37 § 1 in fine. Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. 21 October 2021 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Human rights law - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Afghanistan - Netherlands |
Submission by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in case numbers 202005668/1/V2 and 202102293/1/V2 before the Council of State
September 2021 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
Decision 202102077/1/V2
4 August 2021 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) | Countries: Netherlands - Nigeria |
Decisions 202005934/1 and 202006295/1
28 July 2021 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Livelihoods - Return conditions | Countries: Greece - Netherlands - Syrian Arab Republic |
Decision 202006295/1/V3 and decision 202005934/1/V3
28 July 2021 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Livelihoods - Return conditions | Countries: Greece - Netherlands - Syrian Arab Republic |
Decision 202004766/1/V1
14 July 2021 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Article 1D - Exclusion clauses - Palestinian - Security situation - Statelessness - UNRWA | Countries: Netherlands - Palestine, State of |