1. The case concerns removal of the applicant to Tajikistan, in breach of an interim measure issued by the Court, and the conditions and lawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending removal. Articles 3, 5 and 34 of the Convention are, principally, invoked.
Decision in German available here: http://www.rechtsprechung.niedersachsen.juris.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&docid=MWRE220005233&psml=bsndprod.psml&max=true
Discrimination; intérêt supérieur de l’enfant; développement de l’enfant; droit de l’enfant d’être entendu dans toute procédure judiciaire ou administrative l’intéressant; protection et assistance humanitaire voulues pour les enfants réfugiés; droit de l’enfant de jouir du meilleur état de santé possible; traitements inhumains ou dégradants
Relying on Article 2 (right to life) and Article 3 (prohibition on inhuman or degrading treatment), the
applicants complain that their expulsion to Syria would put them at grave physical risk. Some of the
applicants also complain under Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) that they had no effective
domestic remedies in respect of their complaints under Articles 2 and 3 that their detention pending
removal was arbitrary and the examination of their complaints against detention orders was not
speedy.
Examination of the same matter under another procedure of international investigation or settlement; non-exhaustion of domestic remedies
Risk of torture upon return to country of origin; non-refoulement