Title	R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2021] UKSC 38
Publisher	United Kingdom: Supreme Court
Publication Date	30 July 2021
Country	Eritrea | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Topics	Asylum policy | Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports)
Cite as	R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2021] UKSC 38, United Kingdom: Supreme Court, 30 July 2021, available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,UK_SC,614c9c774.html [accessed 3 October 2022]
Comments	The issues in the appeal are (1) whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in assessing the lawfulness of the policy guidance by reference to whether it (a) created a real risk of more than a minimal number of children being detained, and/or (b) created a risk which could be avoided if the terms of the policy were better formulated; and (2) whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that criterion C, as construed in the context of the relevant policy as a whole, is unlawful.
Disclaimer	This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.