Case Law
- African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights 1
- Australia: Federal Court 3
- Belgium: Cour constitutionnelle 1
- Canada: Federal Court 4
- Canada: Supreme Court 2
- Colombia: Corte Constitucional 1
- Council of Europe: European Commission on Human Rights 9
- Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights 2
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 163
- European Union: Court of First Instance 1
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 16
- France: Conseil constitutionnel 1
- Germany: Bundesverfassungsgericht 2
- India: High Courts 1
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) 2
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACrtHR) 1
- International Criminal Court (ICC) 1
- Ireland: High Court 2
- Ireland: Supreme Court 3
- Israel: Supreme Court 1
- Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) 1
- New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority 2
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 1
- UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 14
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 5
- United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) 1
- United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) 3
- United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee) 2
- United States Supreme Court 1
- Zimbabwe: Supreme Court 1
- Afghanistan 12
- Albania 3
- Algeria 6
- Angola 1
- Armenia 1
- Australia 4
- Austria 3
- Azerbaijan 3
- Bangladesh 2
- Barbados 1
- Belarus 2
- Belgium 9
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 6
- Brazil 1
- Bulgaria 10
- Canada 10
- Central African Republic 1
- China 1
- Colombia 2
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2
- Côte d'Ivoire 2
- Croatia 5
- Cyprus 3
- Czech Republic 2
- Denmark 3
- Djibouti 1
- Ecuador 1
- Egypt 2
- El Salvador 1
- Eritrea 4
- Estonia 1
- Fiji 1
- Finland 1
- France 15
- Georgia 1
- Germany 3
- Greece 14
- Guatemala 1
- Guinea 3
- Guyana 3
- Hungary 4
- India 4
- Iran, Islamic Republic of 14
- Iraq 10
- Ireland 8
- Israel 1
- Italy 8
- Jordan 3
- Kazakhstan 3
- Kuwait 1
- Kyrgyzstan 1
- Latvia 2
- Lebanon 1
- Libya 1
- Lithuania 1
- Luxembourg 1
- Malaysia 1
- Mali 2
- Malta 1
- Mauritania 2
- Moldova, Republic of 1
- Montenegro 1
- Morocco 10
- Myanmar 1
- Nepal 1
- Netherlands 9
- Netherlands Antilles 1
- New Zealand 2
- Nigeria 4
- North Macedonia 3
- Pakistan 1
- Palestine, State of 4
- Peru 1
- Philippines 2
- Romania 9
- Russian Federation 49
- Serbia 5
- Slovakia 1
- Slovenia 6
- Somalia 2
- South Africa 1
- Spain 7
- Sri Lanka 4
- Sudan 7
- Sweden 3
- Switzerland 4
- Syrian Arab Republic 11
- Tanzania, United Republic of 2
- Togo 1
- Tunisia 8
- Türkiye 29
- Turkmenistan 1
- Ukraine 8
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 19
- United States of America 3
- Uzbekistan 13
- Zimbabwe 1
|
CASE OF AMERKHANOV v. TURKEY (Application no. 16026/12)
5 June 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Kazakhstan - Türkiye |
|
Décision n° 2018-709 QPC
Les mots « et dans les délais » figurant à la première phrase du paragraphe IV de l’article L. 512-1 du code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, dans sa rédaction résultant de la loi n° 2016-274 du 7 mars 2016 relative au droit des étrangers en France, sont contraires à la Constitution. 1 June 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Conseil constitutionnel | Topic(s): Appeal / Right to appeal - Effective remedy | Countries: France |
|
AFFAIRE A.E.A. c. GRÈCE (Requête no 39034/12)
The possibility of introducing an asylum claim is a conditio sine qua non for the effective protection of persons in need of international protection. If authorities do not guarantee unhindered access to the asylum procedure, asylum-seekers can not make use of the procedural rights foreseen within the asylum procedure and are at risk of being arrested at any time. Hence even if the asylum procedure offers effective safeguards, these are of no use if, as in the present case, the asylum claim is not registered for a long period of time. [85] violation of article 13 (effective remedy) in combination with article 3 ECHR. 15 March 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Effective protection - Effective remedy - Registration | Countries: Egypt - Greece - Sudan - Türkiye |
|
European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France
Complaint No. 114/2015
This decision concerns several violations to the right of unaccompanied foreign minors to social, legal and economic protection in France on several grounds (violations of Article 17§1 of the Charter) due to: •shortcomings identified in the national shelter, assessment and allocation system of unaccompanied foreign minors; •delays in appointing an ad hoc guardian for unaccompanied foreign minors; •the detention of unaccompanied foreign minors in waiting areas and in hotels; •the use of bone testing to determine the age of unaccompanied foreign minors considered as inappropriate and unreliable; •a lack of clarity to access an effective remedy for unaccompanied foreign minors; 24 January 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights | Legal Instrument: 1961 European Social Charter | Topic(s): Economic, social and cultural rights - Effective remedy - Right to education - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: France |
|
S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria
7 December 2017 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention - Police - Prison or detention conditions | Countries: Bulgaria - Iraq - Switzerland |
|
Majid Shiri
25 October 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Burden-sharing and international co-operation - Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Austria - Bulgaria - Iran, Islamic Republic of |
|
Majid Shiri
25 October 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Burden-sharing and international co-operation - Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Austria - Bulgaria - Iran, Islamic Republic of |
|
Majid Shiri
25 October 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Burden-sharing and international co-operation - Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Austria - Bulgaria - Iran, Islamic Republic of |
|
Majid Shiri
25 October 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Time ExceededYour action exceeded the time limit. |