Case Law
|
case nos. 17LY02181 – 17LY02184
situation in region and Kabul is likely to be qualified as situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict in light of subsidiary protection. In these conditions, the prefect had erred in applying the law by deciding that, instead of authorising to register the application in France, the applicant be transferred to Finland where this country had already rejected the asylum application, expelled and issue an entry ban against the applicant. 13 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour administrative | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Generalized violence - Internal armed conflict - Refoulement | Countries: Afghanistan - Finland - France |
|
Décision N° 17045561, 9 March 2018
Afghanistan: In Kabul, a high-intensity situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict allows granting a civilian the benefit of subsidiary protection under Article L. 712-1 (c) of the CESEDA. 9 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour nationale du droit d'asile | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Generalized violence | Countries: Afghanistan - France |
|
N° 401585
16 October 2017 | Judicial Body: France: Conseil d'Etat | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Generalized violence - Right to life | Countries: Afghanistan - France |
|
Décision No. 12010400, 12 décembre 2013, Cour Nationale du Droit d'Asile
12 December 2013 | Judicial Body: France: Cour nationale du droit d'asile | Topic(s): Generalized violence - International protection - Mandate status - Persecution based on political opinion - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - UNHCR mandate | Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - France |
