UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
case nos. 17LY02181 – 17LY02184
situation in region and Kabul is likely to be qualified as situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict in light of subsidiary protection. In these conditions, the prefect had erred in applying the law by deciding that, instead of authorising to register the application in France, the applicant be transferred to Finland where this country had already rejected the asylum application, expelled and issue an entry ban against the applicant. 13 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour administrative | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Generalized violence - Internal armed conflict - Refoulement | Countries: Afghanistan - Finland - France |
The Dublin II Trap: Transfers of Asylum-Seekers to Greece
10 March 2010 | Publisher: Amnesty International | Document type: Country Reports |
World Refugee Survey 2009 - Europe
17 June 2009 | Publisher: United States Committee for Refugees and Immigrants | Document type: Annual Reports |
U.S. v. Finland
Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH 15 May 2003 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Finland - Sri Lanka |