UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
Campaign Update, April 2020 - June 2020
16 July 2020 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country News |
High-Level Segment on Statelessness: Results and Highlights
May 2020 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Thematic Reports |
Campaign Update, January 2020 - March 2020
22 April 2020 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country News |
Campaign Update, October 2019 - December 2019
20 January 2020 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country News |
CASE OF N.M. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 29343/18)
The Court applied the relevant general principles established in its jurisprudence in the case of F.G. v. Sweden (no. 43611/11) and in the context of removals from Russia to Central Asian States in Mamazhonov v. Russia (no. 17239/13): a) When examining the existence of substantial grounds for believing that the applicant faces a real risk of ill-treatment, the Court recalled that individuals whose extradition was sought by the Uzbek authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted vulnerable groups facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Uzbekistan. The Court found that the applicant was accused of religiously motivated crimes on the basis of documents from the Uzbek authorities. It further considered that the Russian authorities had at their disposal sufficiently substantiated complaints pointing to a real risk of ill-treatment (§15-18). b) With respect to the duty to assess claims of a real risk of ill-treatment through reliance on sufficient relevant material, the Court concluded that the Russian authorities failed to assess the applicant’s claim adequately. The Court paid particular attention to the fact that domestic authorities did not carry out a rigorous scrutiny of the applicant’s and to the national courts’ simplistic rejections of the applicant’s claims (§19-21). c) On the existence of a real risk of ill-treatment or danger to life in their countries of origin, the Court reiterated that it has consistently concluded that the removal of an applicant charged with religiously motivated crimes in Uzbekistan exposes that applicant to a real risk of ill-treatment there (see for example: T.M. and Others v. Russia, no. 31189/15) (§22-23). 3 December 2019 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Kazakhstan - Russian Federation - Uzbekistan |
Joint Conclusions of the 2nd Regional Conference on the Right to Legal Identity and Prevention of Statelessness: Leaving No One Behind at Birth
6 September 2019 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Conference Reports |
Campaign Update, April - June 2019
July 2019 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country News |
Kazakhstan: Order No. 125 On the Approval of Regulation of the State Service "Issue of the Travel Document of the Refugee"
20 February 2019 | Publisher: National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities | Document type: National Decrees, Circulars, Regulation, Policy Documents |
UNHCR Submission for the Universal Periodic Review – Kazakhstan – UPR 34th Session
2019 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Country Reports |
Kazakh activist jailed on charges of misinforming investigators
10 December 2018 | Publisher: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty | Document type: Country News |