Israel
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Israel/Occupied Territories
- Council of Europe, Venice Commission: Constitutional Courts (Links)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Israel
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Israel and the Occupied Territories
- Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) - State of Palestine
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) - Israel
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC in Israel and the occupied territories
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Israel
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Israel
- Office of the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process (UNSCO)
- ReliefWeb - Israel
- ReliefWeb - occupied Palestinian territory
- UNHCR - Israel
- UNHCR - Occupied Palestinian Territory
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Israel
- United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF)
- United Nations News Centre - News Focus: Middle East
- United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO)
- United States Department of State - Israel
- United States Department of State - Palestinian Territories
- United States Department of State: Congressional Research Service Reports (CRS) and Issue Briefs
- Walla
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Israel
|
Esther Segai Gersagher et al. v. the Knesset et al.
The Court is requested to order the voidness of section 4 of the Prevention of Infiltration and Ensuring the Departure of Infiltrators from Israel 5775-2014 (Legislative Amendments and Temporary Provisions) 5775-2014 (hereinafter: the "Amending Law") that obliges foreign workers who entered Israel not through a border crossing (hereinafter: "Infiltrator Workers") and their employers to deposit in a special bank account a total amount at a rate of 36% of the worker's wages that will be paid to the worker only at the time of his departure from Israel (hereinafter: the "Deposit Scheme"). In short, the Petitioners argue that the Deposit Scheme, in general, or in the least some of its components, is unconstitutional and therefore should be voided. 23 April 2020 | Judicial Body: Israel: High Court of Justice | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Administrative law - Asylum-seekers - Constitutional law - Illegal entry - Non-refoulement | Countries: Eritrea - Israel - Sudan |
|
Report of the Special Rapporteur on independence of judges
and lawyers, Addendum : Communications to and from Governments
18 June 2010 | Publisher: UN Human Rights Council | Document type: Country Reports |
