The Court reiterated that Article 1 (obligation to respect human rights) of the European Convention
limited its scope to persons within the jurisdiction of the States Parties to the Convention. In the
present case, it noted that the applicants were not within Belgium’s jurisdiction in respect of the
circumstances complained of under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
The Court also considered that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was inapplicable in the present case.
The entry to Belgian territory which would have resulted from the visas being issued did not engage
a “civil” right within the meaning of Article 6 § 1.
Lastly, the Court noted that this conclusion did not prejudice the endeavours being made by the
States Parties to facilitate access to asylum procedures through their embassies and/or consular
representations.
The court annulled article 1 of the Law of 15 december 1980 on aliens on the grounds that, the absence of an derogatory regime to the benefit of stateless persons for the fee due in the residence regularisation procedure, constitutes an unjustified difference of treatment between refugees and stateless persons. The absence of an automatic right of residence implies that, de facto, stateless persons have to pay this fee whilst refugees do not.