Last Updated: Wednesday, 17 May 2023, 15:20 GMT

Human rights / Arbitrary arrest and detention

Filter:
Showing 51-60 of 10,412 results
Alternatives to Detention Self-study Modules: Module 2/2

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

Alternatives to Detention Self-study Modules: Module 2/3

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

Alternatives to Detention Self-study Modules: Module 2/3

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

Alternatives to Detention Self-study Modules: Module 4/2

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

Immigration Detention Monitoring Self-study Modules: Programme Module 0

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

Immigration Detention Monitoring Self-study Modules: Programme Module 1

November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals

The Queen on the application of:1) Hemmati; 2)Khalili;3) Abdulkadir; 4) Mohammed (Appellants) - and - The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) and Between The Queen on the application of SS (Respondent) -and- The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant)

The principal issues in the appeals concern the meaning and effect of Article 2(n) and Article 28 of Dublin III ("Article 2(n)" and "Article 28", respectively), which relate to the detention of an individual for the purpose of transfer to another Member State under that Regulation. Mr Hemmati and Mr Khalili also raise a distinct issue regarding whether Garnham J was right to hold that their detention was lawful by application of the usual principles of domestic law first adumbrated in Re Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 and rehearsed in later authorities such as R (I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888 and Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 ("the Hardial Singh principles").

4 October 2018 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Prison or detention conditions | Countries: Afghanistan - Austria - Bulgaria - Iran, Islamic Republic of - Iraq - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Country Policy and Information Note Sri Lanka: Sexual orientation and gender identity and expression

October 2018 | Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office | Document type: Country Reports

Country Policy and Information Note Sri Lanka: Sexual orientation and gender identity and expression

October 2018 | Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office | Document type: Country Reports

Country Policy and Information Note India: Sexual orientation and gender identity and expression

October 2018 | Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office | Document type: Country Reports

Search Refworld