Denmark: Parliament should reject cruel and regressive changes to refugee law
Publisher | Amnesty International |
Publication Date | 21 January 2016 |
Cite as | Amnesty International, Denmark: Parliament should reject cruel and regressive changes to refugee law, 21 January 2016, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/56a138ee326a.html [accessed 2 January 2017] |
Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |
Proposed changes to Denmark's refugee law would have a devastating impact on vulnerable people who, in addition to having assets seized, would be forced to wait years for the chance to reunite with their family members trapped in warzones and refugee camps, said Amnesty International today.
The Danish Parliament is set to debate Thursday, ahead of a vote Tuesday, on proposed amendments to the Aliens Act, including one that would make "war refugees" wait for three years before being eligible to apply for family reunification. The process itself could then still take years.
"It's simply cruel to force people who are running from conflicts to make an impossible choice: either bring children and other loved ones on dangerous, even lethal journeys, or leave them behind and face a prolonged separation while family members continue to suffer the horrors of war," said Gauri van Gulik, Amnesty International's Deputy Director for Europe and Central Asia.
"Separation can have a devastating impact on families, including their rehabilitation from experiences of trauma and their ability to integrate and adapt to life in a new country."
While there has been a public outcry over the Danish government's proposal to seize certain refugees' assets, there are a host of other equally far-reaching and regressive measures being moved swiftly through the country's parliament. Among them are further restrictions on eligibility requirements for permanent residency, reductions to the length of temporary residence permits and the introduction of fees for family reunification applications (currently 7,000 Danish Krone or approximately 900 euro per application), as well as the travel costs of family members to Denmark.
The government has proceeded with these plans despite acknowledging that they risk violating Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to family life. The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) has also warned that these proposals risk violating other articles of the European Convention and the global Convention on the Rights of the Child. The measures - including amendments passed in November 2015 making it possible for police to detain asylum-seekers and migrants without judicial oversight - are part of the government's stated aim to make Denmark less attractive to asylum-seekers.
Following Thursday's parliamentary debate on the latest amendments, a final vote on 26 January would bring them into law. Amnesty International is urging states to press Denmark to change its worrying stance on refugees when it faces scrutiny at the UN's Universal Periodic Review on Thursday.
"The international community must call Denmark out as it enters a race to the bottom. Denmark was one of the first champions of the Refugee Convention, but its government is now brazenly creating blocks to the well-being and safety of refugee families," said Gauri van Gulik.