Syrian Arab Republic
- Case Law 3
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- Amnesty International - Syria
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Syrian Arab Rep
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Syria
- Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) - Syria
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) - Syria
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC in Syria
- International Crisis Group (ICG) - Syria
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Syrian Arab Republic
- ReliefWeb - Syrian Arab Republic (the)
- Syrian Human Rights Committee (SHRC)
- UNHCR - Syrian Arab Republic
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Syrian Arab Republic
- United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF)
- United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO)
- United States Department of State - Syria
- Women's Learning Partnership - Claiming Equal Citizenship
- World Food Programme (WFP) - Syria
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Syrian Arab Republic
|
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL PIKAMÄE, in Case C‑483/20 XXXX
v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium))
1. Migratory journeys are often the result of a combination of two elements: chance and necessity. In the case before the Court, a Syrian national, after travelling through Libya and Turkey, arrived in Austria, where, out of necessity, he lodged an application for international protection. After obtaining refugee status, he went to Belgium to be reunited with his two children, one of whom is a minor, and there lodged a new application for international protection, which was declared inadmissible in view of the prior recognition granted in the first Member State. 2. It is against that background that the question arises, to my knowledge for the first time, whether, in particular, the fundamental right to respect for family life enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), read in conjunction with the obligation to take into consideration the child’s best interests set out in Article 24(2) of the Charter, can override the inadmissibility mechanism for applications for international protection laid down in Article 33(2)(a) of Directive 2013/32/EU. (2) 30 September 2021 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Right to family life | Countries: Austria - Belgium - Syrian Arab Republic |
|
Bundesrepublik Deutschland gegen Adel Hamed (C‑540/17), Amar Omar (C‑541/17) (Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung)
13 November 2019 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Decision on admissibility - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures | Countries: Germany - Syrian Arab Republic |
|
A.S. v Republika Slovenija
26 July 2017 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Border controls - Border crossers - Deportation / Forcible return - Refugee / Asylum law - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Rejection at border | Countries: Slovenia - Syrian Arab Republic |
