Last Updated: Monday, 23 January 2017, 14:59 GMT

Русский
| English

Syrian Arab Republic

Case Law 1
Query Responses 2

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Selected filters: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription

Filter:

Showing 1-3 of 3 results

RRT Case No. 1112951 1 May 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Case Law
Syria: 1. Country Advice SYR39739 of 20 January 2012, states that that the Syrian government had recalled reservists in the wake of the Syrian uprising. However, this 2011 recall reportedly had mixed success with credible evidence' suggesting that the regime was 'unable to call back more than 60 per cent of its reserves', according to a December 2011 report by Michael Weiss titled Safe Area for Syria: An Assessment of Legality, Logistics and Hazards. What were the reasons behind the government's inability to call back 60 per cent of its reserves? For example, were the reservists inaccessible or had they intentionally evaded the recall? 2. Is there any information to suggest that reservists have faced punishment or illtreatment for failing to respond to the government's recall of its reservists? 21 February 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
Syria: 1. Please provide information on conscription and military service in Syria. 2. Is it likely that someone who has completed his military service is considered a reservist and has been called upon to serve in that capacity? 20 January 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips