UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
case nos. 17LY02181 – 17LY02184
situation in region and Kabul is likely to be qualified as situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict in light of subsidiary protection. In these conditions, the prefect had erred in applying the law by deciding that, instead of authorising to register the application in France, the applicant be transferred to Finland where this country had already rejected the asylum application, expelled and issue an entry ban against the applicant. 13 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour administrative | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Generalized violence - Internal armed conflict - Refoulement | Countries: Afghanistan - Finland - France |
Décision N° 17045561, 9 March 2018
Afghanistan: In Kabul, a high-intensity situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict allows granting a civilian the benefit of subsidiary protection under Article L. 712-1 (c) of the CESEDA. 9 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour nationale du droit d'asile | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Generalized violence | Countries: Afghanistan - France |
Décision N° 17045561, 9 March 2018
Afghanistan: In Kabul, a high-intensity situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict allows granting a civilian the benefit of subsidiary protection under Article L. 712-1 (c) of the CESEDA. 9 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour nationale du droit d'asile | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Generalized violence | Countries: Afghanistan - France |
Décision N° 17045561, 9 March 2018
Afghanistan: In Kabul, a high-intensity situation of indiscriminate violence resulting from an internal armed conflict allows granting a civilian the benefit of subsidiary protection under Article L. 712-1 (c) of the CESEDA. 9 March 2018 | Judicial Body: France: Cour nationale du droit d'asile | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): Complementary forms of protection - Generalized violence | Countries: Afghanistan - France |
Surge in violence hits fragile Afghan economy
7 February 2018 | Publisher: Institute for War and Peace Reporting | Document type: Country News |
N° 401585
16 October 2017 | Publisher: France: Conseil d'Etat | Document type: Bilateral Treaties/Agreements |
Afghanistan: Human Rights and Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict - Special Report Attack on a Peaceful Demonstration in Kabul, 23 July 2016
October 2016 | Publisher: UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) | Document type: Country Reports |
AATA Case No. 1319759
10 May 2016 | Judicial Body: Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): 1951 Refugee Convention - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Flight by land, air or sea - Freedom of religion - Generalized violence - Hazara - Religious discrimination - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Afghanistan - Australia |
Informationszentrum Asyl und Migration Briefing Notes (25 April 2016)
25 April 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News |
Information Centre Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes (25 April 2016)
25 April 2016 | Publisher: Germany: Federal Office for Migration and Asylum | Document type: Country News |